MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1978947739 · doi:10.1353/sho.2011.0166

We Are Coming, Unafraid: The Jewish Legions and the Promised Land in the First World War (review)

2011· article· en· W1978947739 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueShofar · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJudaismInfantryAncient historySpanish Civil WarWorld War IIHistoryFront (military)DiasporaLawPolitical scienceArchaeologyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: We Are Coming, Unafraid: The Jewish Legions and the Promised Land in the First World War David R. Woodward We Are Coming, Unafraid: The Jewish Legions and the Promised Land in the First World War, by Michael Keren and Shlomit Keren. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010. 191 pp. $39.95. General Edmund Allenby, who commanded the Egyptian Expeditionary Force that conquered Jerusalem in December 1917, desperately needed men in the spring of 1918. Many of his combat-tested units had been transferred to the western front in France to thwart a series of powerful German offensives. The British War Office did what it could to replace his losses. The result was the creation of perhaps the most multicultural force in British military history. Only one of Allenby's eleven divisions was fully British. In addition to soldiers from Armenia, Burma, Algeria, Australia, New Zealand, India, South Africa, Italy, France, Singapore, Hong Kong, the West Indies, and Egypt, Allenby's polyglot force included three Jewish battalions, the 38th, the 39th, and the 40th, who served with the Royal Fusiliers. A fourth Jewish battalion, the 42nd, remained in Plymouth as a holding battalion. These Jewish battalions had the distinction of being the first Jewish infantry formations in some two thousand years (a mule transport unit, composed primarily of Palestinian Zionists, had been involved in the Gallipoli campaign in 1915). [End Page 182] Where did these Jewish recruits come from and what motivated them to join? Some came from Palestine and Great Britain. Others came from the great cities of New York, Montreal, and Buenos Aires, which had large Jewish enclaves. Some volunteers sought adventure, and a few were even gangsters. Others were coerced into service. This was true of the 38th Battalion, which was composed of Jews from Great Britain. The government gave un-naturalized Russian Jews the choice of joining the army or being repatriated to Russia. Volunteers mostly came from North America (the 39th Battalion) or Palestine (the 40th Battalion). Whether they were volunteers or were coerced into service, many Legionnaires, among them future leaders of Israel such as such as Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (second president) and David Ben-Gurion (first prime minister), embraced the mission of "liberating the Promised Land" from Turkish control. Three months after its decision to create a Jewish Legion, the British government provided added impetus to this mission with the Balfour Declaration, which promised to support the revival of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Wearing the Star of David insignia on the left sleeve of their uniforms, these Yiddish-speaking Legionnaires further strengthened their identity by eating kosher food, singing Jewish songs as they marched under both a British and Hebrew flag, celebrating Jewish holidays, and attending lectures on Jewish affairs. The development of a Jewish consciousness in a campaign resulting in the conquest of the Promised Land and not as a reaction to antisemitism is the primary focus of Michael and Shlomit Keren. Relying on a handful of memoirs, diaries, and letters, the authors examine the various phases of the Jewish Legion's journey to the Promised Land. The military role of the four Jewish battalions proved to be minor. One battalion remained in Britain as a holding battalion and another was stationed in Egypt. Only two, the 38th and 39th Battalions, were sent to the front a few months before Allenby launched his decisive offensive in September at Megiddo. The 38th and 39th Battalions suffered from the hostile environment of intense heat, blowing dust, and biting insects in the Jordan Valley, but saw limited action against the Turks. During the rapid destruction of the Turkish forces, the Jewish Battalions were attached to Chaytor's Force, which harassed the retreating Turkish Fourth Army. Once the Turks had been defeated, the British high command played down the participation of Jewish battalions. In his victory speech in December 1918, Allenby recognized all of the nationalities in his army except Jews. Sensitive to Arab hostility, the British also forbade the press in Palestine or Egypt to discuss the existence of Jewish military formations. Some Jewish Legionnaires, especially North Americans who sought unsuccessfully to relocate...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,950
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,975

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle