MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1979081097 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01831.x

Remarkable follow-up experiences of a severe persistent case of pemphigoid gestationis

2005· letter· en· W1979081097 sur OpenAlexaff
M.M. Black, Nabeel Najem

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical and Experimental Dermatology · 2005
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Établissements canadiensSt. Thomas Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDermatologyPemphigoidBullous pemphigoidImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1998, we reported a severe case of pemphigoid gestationis that eventually went into remission with repeated courses of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) combined with oral ciclosporin.1 In brief, the patient was a 17‐year‐old Kuwaiti woman who developed pemphigoid gestationis at 20 weeks' gestation in her first pregnancy. There was a striking family history of autoimmune disease, with her father having vitiligo and her elder sister having aggressive systemic lupus erythematosus complicated by lupus nephritis. The patient's tissue type was HLA A23, 33 B50, 51 BW 4, 6 CW 6, DR 4, 7 53, DQ 2, 8, and that of her husband (a first cousin) was HLA DR 4, 17, 52, 53, DQ 2, 8. By the time she presented in London, she had unfortunately sustained a fetal death in utero at 30 weeks' gestation and was markedly cushingoid from oral corticosteroid therapy. The pemphigoid gestationis was fully confirmed immunopathologically, and after two courses of IVIg, combined with oral ciclosporin, her disease gradually went into partial remission and the dosages of corticosteroids could be reduced. She then returned to Kuwait. The follow‐up information obtained on this patient is of interest. Against medical advice, she became pregnant again in August 1997, while she was still on 10 mg of prednisolone, but was soon able to discontinue this after delivery. She had a full term pregnancy, and delivered a baby girl, weighing 2.62 kg, in April, 1998. At no stage during the pregnancy or the postpartum period did the patient show any flare of her pemphigoid gestationis. Another pregnancy followed, and she delivered a healthy full term baby girl, birth weight 3.155 kg, in April 2001. Her fourth child, a full term healthy boy, birth weight 2.70 kg, was delivered in June 2003. At no time during any of these three subsequent pregnancies did she illustrate any flare‐up of her disorder. The only medical complication she sustained was during the second pregnancy, in October 1997, when she developed papilloedema of the left eye with rapid visual deterioration at 16 weeks' pregnancy. She then received pulse steroid therapy, 1 g methylprednisolone for five consecutive days, advised by an ophthalmologist, and showed good response, with rapid improvement of her vision. The condition was diagnosed as autoimmune optic neuritis. In November 1998, the patient developed some weakness, fatigue and a goitre, and thyroid function tests revealed high thyroid‐stimulating hormone levels: 40.8 U/mL (normal range 0.27–4.6 U/ml). Diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid disease was made. During a recent visit to Kuwait (March 2004), we reviewed the patient, who appeared normal in every way, apart from residual striae distensae, relating to pregnancies and high‐dose previous corticosteroid therapy. In our experience, it is usual for successive pregnancies to be affected by pemphigoid gestationis once the disease has been initiated. Occasional pregnancies that skip this complication have been reported, with an instance of approximately, 8%.2 For our patient, there was no evidence of male consort change and as far as we were aware, her husband (also a first cousin), fathered all four of these pregnancies. During all the years of our interest in this remarkable and perhaps unique auto immune dermatosis of pregnancy, we have never encountered three successive pregnancies being spared from the condition when the original condition was so severe in the first pregnancy. For this reason, we think the follow‐up on this case is worth reporting. Conflict of interest: none declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,341
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical and Experimental DermatologyMême sujetAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesTravaux en français237 207