MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1979169649 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0129

Gambling with Failure (review)

2007· article· en· W1979169649 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Smaro Kamboureli

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryForensic engineeringEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Gambling with Failure Smaro Kamboureli (bio) Antonio D'Alfonso. Gambling with Failure Exile Editions. 290. $19.95 Gambling with Failure is marked by the three elements I have always found to be distinctive in the content and form of Antonio D'Alfonso's essay writing: his unswerving concern with the material and ideological conditions that shape the cultural industries and literary production in Canada; his commitment to literature 'in Italics'; and the affect that marks his brazen approach to his intellectual preoccupations. Antonio D'Alfonso has long been an institution all by himself, albeit the kind of institution that challenges the calcified policies and ideologies of established cultural structures. A poet, novelist, critic, and scriptwriter, he has published many books and produced four films. Trilingual, he is one [End Page 646] of a handful of writers in Canada who publish regularly in both English and French. His 2000 novel, Fabrizio's Passion, won the Bressani Award, while his most recent novel, Un vendredi du mois d'août, won the 2004 Trillium Prize for fiction in French. And, as the editor and publisher of Guernica Editions, he has brought to light a large number of interesting and handsomely produced books, most of them about or coming from the intricate space of cultural differences. This is an excellent record by any standard. Why, then, are his essays invariably written in the mode of complaint? What does the embittered point of view of his essays speak of – and to? Failure, for D'Alfonso, is not synonymous with falling short. Instead, it is a literary trope and an ironic, indeed polemic, stance against the homogeneity of taste and the capitalist logic that informs literary production in Canada. As he writes, for 'a growing number of artists ... art is showbiz. If you read the reviews published in papers and magazines, you could conclude that everyone has become a genius. We have forgotten that what counts is not popular or monetary success, but the process of creativity.' It is this state of affairs, what he calls 'literary pornography,' that fuels his bitterness, that compels him to embrace failure: 'If every book is a masterpiece, then please make sure mine is a failure.' Failure, then, is a double sign: it speaks for a difference of imagination, for a culture that does not 'risk[] disfiguration'; and it stands for the lack of public recognition and commercial success – 'Publishing books is more a cultural duty than a money venture'; 'I have lost three wives since 1978, the year I founded Guernica.' Turning failure into an instrument of self-reflection and cultural critique may be an apt, indeed enabling, gesture, but it is not without its pitfalls. D'Alfonso's cultural politics of failure unfolds through a series of paradoxes. While they reflect the uneasy coexistence of contradictions in the cultural domain, these paradoxes are also the product of inconsistencies in his arguments. His lament for the current state of literature is rooted in the rampant signs of 'cultural necrophilia,' mimicking the past 'with the hope of concealing what is being done at the present time,' but he is himself fixated on a certain aesthetic past, the avant-garde aesthetics of modernism and such figures as Baudelaire, Joyce, T.S. Eliot, and Bresson. Though he argues eloquently for the importance of the 'ethnic writer,' beyond his abiding concern with Italian culture, there is a reluctance to acknowledge the large number of diasporic authors who have challenged, and continue to challenge, mainstream literature, or the many critical debates about the nation-state and race issues. Reading his essays outside the Canadian context, one could easily surmise that his is the only voice that struggles to speak on behalf of 'minority' writers. Moreover, though he 'bicker[s]' about 'the era of anti-difference,' it is not clear what he means by 'pluriculturalism,' especially as he does not pay heed to ethnic writing other than Italian. [End Page 647] Similarly, while he bemoans the fact that there is no 'literature engagé' in Canada, he rushes to assure his readers that 'I am not professing the stance of the writer engagé.' It is not surprising, then, that D'Alfonso's self...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,051
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,172

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0510,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,189
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetAmerican and British Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207