The abdominal compartment syndrome: evolving concepts and future directions
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The modern-era abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) was first described as a ‘new’ clinical entity in the 1980s in emergency surgery patients, despite being described over 100 years earlier [1]. This stimulated scientific research leading to a better understanding of ACS, and the development of strategies to prevent and treat the condition [2]. Simultaneously, several investigators described the impact of the prelude to ACS – intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), where organ function is impaired at lower intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in the range of 12–20 mmHg [3]. This new knowledge has improved our understanding of the interactions between the different body compartments and new pathophysiologic terms have been coined, such as the polycompartment syndrome [4]. Within this concept, abdominal wall compliance seems to be a key factor that has only recently been better investigated [5]. Although controversial initially, IAH is now widely accepted as a cause of organ dysfunction and ACS is recognized as a catastrophic disturbance of a patient’s physiology that requires urgent intervention and guided therapies [6]. Over the years, several strategies have been developed to attempt to mitigate IAH and to prevent progression to ACS [2]. IAP monitoring in patients at risk is the key element in early detection. IAP measurement methods are now universally available and have become safe, reliable and reproducible [7]. IAH does not only affect abdominal organs – raised IAP affects the different organ systems [6]; it greatly impacts the respiratory system, hemodynamics, and even cerebral perfusion. IAH is an important determinant of the compliance of the respiratory system, and practical consequences for mechanically ventilated patients are important [8]. IAH influences our traditional filling pressures, and volumetric preload indices better reflect the true preload status in IAH [9]. Improved insights into the pathophysiology and causes of IAH and ACS have led to improved management of patients at risk [10]. Open abdomen management and parallel changes in resuscitation strategies have now dramatically reduced the incidence of full-blown ACS [11], which has been observed most dramatically in trauma patients [12]. This integrated, IAH-focused approach has almost completely abolished ACS in some hospitals [13]. Whereas the incidence of end-stage, highly lethal, overt ACS is decreasing, IAH persists and is likely to increasingly do so as critically ill patients increasingly survive initial insults. Better understanding of the risks associated with IAH is thus necessary, as well as recognizing clinically important thresholds [14] and critically assessing the impact of different interventions aimed at IAP. One of the major challenges currently in our ICUs is the management of open abdomen patients. An open abdomen is at high risk of a myriad of complications and planning for a safe same-admission closure begins immediately after opening [15]. It has become clear that ICU management also impacts the feasibility of closure, and more information is needed on how intensivists and surgeons can collaborate to reach this goal. Avoiding massive fluid overload and initiating de-resuscitation as soon as possible should be considered [12]. As a highly focused specialist society, the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) has been assisting healthcare workers to better understand IAH and ACS; the WSACS’s efforts have certainly contributed to many advances that have been made in the past [2]. As ACS is no longer the main challenge in this context, the WSACS recently changed name to the WSACS – the Abdominal Compartment Society in order to maintain relevance and concordance between the priorities of the society and the reprioritization in the challenges that are ahead of us. WSACS – the Abdominal Compartment Society is thus ready to address the challenges of truly appreciating the physiology, pathophysiology, and reconstructive anatomy of the abdominal compartment within the overall context of human injury and illness. WSACS – the Abdominal Compartment Society remains a dedicated multidisciplinary international society of clinicians, scientists, clinician-scientists, and other healthcare workers dedicated to understanding the holistic implications of IAP. Further, the society understands and promotes health through championing anatomically functional abdominal compartment reconstruction at the earliest time after critical illness/injury, balancing the needs at all times for physiologic decompression and avoidance of IAH with anatomic reconstruction. Understanding the subtle implications of modest IAH on all critically ill/injured patients and especially validating potential therapeutic interventions with new sound evidence remain our biggest challenges. A new emphasis will be placed upon embracing those engaged in the emerging surgical subspecialty of abdominal wall reconstruction. Ultimately, complete integration of these findings in the management of patients with relevant abdominal conditions affected by IAH remains the final goal. In conclusion, IAH and ACS have evolved from poorly understood and inconsistently diagnosed disorders. Overall, ACS is decreasing through early recognition and directed management of IAH. In this context, WSACS – the Abdominal Compartment Society will continue its educational activities, support research, and promote evidence-based guidelines in order to continue to improve outcome in critically ill patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle