Pharmacologic Management of Migraine
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Letters16 March 2004Pharmacologic Management of MigraineAndrew J. Dowson, MB, Roger K. Cady, MD, Stewart J. Tepper, MD, Timothy R. Smith, MD, and Gary Shapero, MDAndrew J. Dowson, MBFrom The King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Headache Care Center and Primary Care Network, Springfield, MO 65804; New England Center for Headache, Stamford, CT 06902; Mercy Health Research, St. Louis, MO 63017; and Markham Headache and Pain Treatment Center, Unionville, Ontario L3R OW7, Canada.Search for more papers by this author, Roger K. Cady, MDFrom The King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Headache Care Center and Primary Care Network, Springfield, MO 65804; New England Center for Headache, Stamford, CT 06902; Mercy Health Research, St. Louis, MO 63017; and Markham Headache and Pain Treatment Center, Unionville, Ontario L3R OW7, Canada.Search for more papers by this author, Stewart J. Tepper, MDFrom The King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Headache Care Center and Primary Care Network, Springfield, MO 65804; New England Center for Headache, Stamford, CT 06902; Mercy Health Research, St. Louis, MO 63017; and Markham Headache and Pain Treatment Center, Unionville, Ontario L3R OW7, Canada.Search for more papers by this author, Timothy R. Smith, MDFrom The King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Headache Care Center and Primary Care Network, Springfield, MO 65804; New England Center for Headache, Stamford, CT 06902; Mercy Health Research, St. Louis, MO 63017; and Markham Headache and Pain Treatment Center, Unionville, Ontario L3R OW7, Canada.Search for more papers by this author, and Gary Shapero, MDFrom The King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Headache Care Center and Primary Care Network, Springfield, MO 65804; New England Center for Headache, Stamford, CT 06902; Mercy Health Research, St. Louis, MO 63017; and Markham Headache and Pain Treatment Center, Unionville, Ontario L3R OW7, Canada.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-140-6-200403160-00031-w1 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:Snow and colleagues (1) provided clinical guidelines for the management of migraine by primary care physicians. Although these guidelines generally follow those published by the U.S. Headache Consortium (2), several issues relating to their advice may result in suboptimal care in clinical practice.All recently published evidence-based guidelines for migraine management, including those of the U.S. Headache Consortium (2), the U.S. Primary Care Network (3), and the U.K. Migraine in Primary Care Advisors (4), provide evidence for and recommend a strategy of individualized care for migraine. The therapy is chosen on the basis of the historic pattern ...References1. Snow V, Weiss K, Wall EM, Mottur-Pilson C. Pharmacologic management of acute attacks of migraine and prevention of migraine headache. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:840-9. [PMID: 12435222] LinkGoogle Scholar2. Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55:754-62. [PMID: 10993991] Available at www.neurology.org/cgi/reprint/55/6/754.pdf. Google Scholar3. Bedell AW, Cady RK, Diamond ML, Farmer KU, Friesen CP, Johnson JM, et al . Patient-Centered Strategies for Effective Management of Migraine. Springfield, MO: Primary Care Network; 2000. Google Scholar4. Dowson AJ, Lipscombe S, Sender J, Rees T, Watson D. New guidelines for the management of migraine in primary care. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18:414-39. [PMID: 12487508] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Lipton RB, Diamond S, Reed M, Diamond ML, Stewart WF. Migraine diagnosis and treatment: results from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001;41:638-45. [PMID: 11554951] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Stone AM, Lainez MJ, Sawyer JP. Stratified care vs step care strategies for migraine: the Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000;284:2599-605. [PMID: 11086366] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From The King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Headache Care Center and Primary Care Network, Springfield, MO 65804; New England Center for Headache, Stamford, CT 06902; Mercy Health Research, St. Louis, MO 63017; and Markham Headache and Pain Treatment Center, Unionville, Ontario L3R OW7, Canada. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoPharmacologic Management of Acute Attacks of Migraine and Prevention of Migraine Headache Vincenza Snow , Kevin Weiss , Eric M. Wall , Christel Mottur-Pilson , and Metrics 16 March 2004Volume 140, Issue 6Page: W-26KeywordsAspirinDrug therapyDrugsHeadachesMigraineNSAIDsPharmacoeconomicsPrimary care physiciansSubcutaneous injectionsVomiting ePublished: 16 March 2004 Issue Published: 16 March 2004 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».