The Cochrane library and the treatment of major depression in children and youth: an overview of reviews
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Major depression (MDD) in children and adolescents is a mood disorder that has up to 25% lifetime prevalence by the end of adolescence. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments are recommended to reduce symptoms, increase psychosocial functioning, and prevent relapse. Traditionally, decisions for these treatments were made based on reported effects for adults, but a body of pediatric‐based evidence is now emerging to inform treatment decisions. Objectives To synthesize the evidence currently in the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) related to the question: ‘In children and youth with diagnosed major depression, do pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic treatments improve symptom response, response rates, functional capacity, adherence and persistence, and decrease cost and adverse events?’. Methods CDSR was searched using the term ‘depression’ in the title for all systematic reviews examining pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for the treatment of depression in children ⩽18 years. Data were extracted and entered into tables; data were synthesized using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Results Of the studies included in the CDSR, there was no significant improvement in treatment outcomes in depressed children and adolescents treated with pharmacological (tricyclic antidepressant [TCA] or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI]) or nonpharmacological (exercise) interventions. Author's Conclusions Although this overview indicates no clear evidence for pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for treatment of depression in this age group, the CDSR does not include several recent research publications in this area that demonstrate beneficial effects of treatment. In context of existing research there may be a moderate effect of SSRI in moderate to severe depression in children and youth. Best practice recommendations are consideration of treatment with SSRI (fluoxetine first line) in moderate to severe depression with close monitoring and weighing risk/benefit profile based on individual assessment. Psychotherapeutic interventions not in this overview, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal Therapy (IPT), have some evidence of effectiveness in mild to moderate depression. Although exercise remains an important part of healthy living, there is no evidence to support its use in treatment of depression in children and adolescents. This overview in the context of recent research indicates the need for ongoing study in this important area of child and youth mental health. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The Cochrane Collaboration
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».