MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1979666220 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh884

Resolution of renal allograft-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder with the introduction of sirolimus

2005· article· en· W1979666220 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jeffrey S. Zaltzman, Kathy Chun, Serge Jothy

Notice bibliographique

RevueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePolyomavirus and related diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSirolimusLymphoproliferative disordersUrologyTransplantationRenal transplantPost-transplant lymphoproliferative disorderInternal medicineLymphomaRituximab

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1Division of Nephrology and 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, St. Michael's Hospital and 2Department of Pathology, University Health Network University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Lymphoid neoplasia has remained a serious complication following solid organ transplantation. Recent data suggest an 11.8-fold higher risk of lymphoma compared with the general population over a 10 year period [1]. Although the risk is greatest within the first year post-transplant, the incidence remains high throughout the entire post-transplant period. Risk factors include unrestrained proliferation of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and the overall immunosuppression burden [2,3]. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may also occur within the allograft and may be mistaken for acute rejection. The mTOR inhibitor sirolimus is currently under investigation as an anti-tumour agent, and its use as an immunosuppressive agent in solid organ transplants has been associated with a lower risk of post-transplant malignancies, including PTLD [4,5]. A 32-year-old patient with end-stage renal disease secondary to vesicoureteric reflux received a one haplotype-matched kidney from his sister. He had been on thrice weekly haemodialysis for 2.5 years. Both donor and recipient were cytomegalovirus IgG negative, but EBV IgG positive. At the time of transplant, a donor kidney biopsy was performed as per standard practice at our institution. The biopsy revealed normal renal histology. The recipient had a panel-reactive antibody of 0% and was a one-haplotype match with his donor. At the time of transplant, he was enrolled into a prospective three-arm clinical trial comparing steroid avoidance, rapid steroid tapering and standard steroid dosing. He had been randomized to an immunosuppressive regimen of basilixmab 20 mg on day 0 and day 4 post-transplant, solumedrol 1 mg/kg pre-transplant and 1 mg/kg bid for 48 h post-transplant, followed by a rapid oral prednisone taper with discontinuation of prednisone by day 7, EC-MPS 720 mg bid and cyclosporin microemulsion, dosed to keep 2 h post-dose (C2) levels between 1200 and 1600 ng/ml. There were no immediate or early surgical complications and the allograft functioned well with an immediate decline in serum creatinine. However, by day 5 post-transplant, the creatinine had stabilized at 200–240 µmol/l with a C2 cyclosporin level of 1430 ng/ml. At that time, the white blood cell count was 6.2 × 109/l and the lymphocytes were normal at 2.2 × 109/l. The patient remained asymptomatic and afebrile. Renal ultrasound and Dopplers were normal, and there was no response to reduction in cyclosporin dose. A renal biopsy was performed on day 7 post-transplant (Figure 1). There was no tubulitis, vasculitis or glomerulitis. Despite intensive screening of all biopsy sections, no evidence for either cellular- or antibody-mediated rejection could be found. However, there was a dense intense infiltrate of mononuclear cells occupying approximately one-quarter of the renal cortex. The cells were monotonous and medium size, fairly atypical with a moderate degree of mitotic activity. Although some T cells were present, the predominant cells were B lymphocytes (CD20+) demonstrating both κ and λ light chain positivity, but negative for EBV virus by in situ hybridization.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,795
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,400

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations21
Publié2005
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationMême sujetPolyomavirus and related diseasesTravaux en français237 207