Evaluation of Stress And Geomechanical Characteristics of Rocks At Penn West's Pembina CO-Enhanced Oil Recovery Pilot Operation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The capture and geological storage of CO2 is emerging as a viable option to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is a potential process for long-term CO2 storage. The safety of CO2 storage is critically important because decision and policy makers, regulatory agencies and the public must be assured that these operations are safe and that CO2 has been removed permanently from the atmosphere. Several pilot CO2-EOR operations in Alberta have been initiated with support from both the provincial and federal governments, among them Penn West Energy Trust's pilot in the Pembina field, located from 5- 12-048-09W5 to 10-11-048-09W5, where a multidisciplinary research program is being currently conducted. Among the subjects of investigation are the stress and geomechanical properties of the rocks, which are decisive elements in evaluating the safety of CO2 injection and storage. This paper includes an assessment of the stress regime of the Pembina oil field and a review of the relevant rock properties. Introduction One of the major issues affecting the successful capture and geological storage of CO2 is the minimization of the potential for CO2 leakage. Leakage may occur through faults and fractures, natural or induced. These potential CO2 leakage paths are controlled by geomechanical parameters, such as the in-situ stress regime, rock stiffness and rock strength, and the integrity of the wellbore seal. The Penn West Energy Trust CO2-EOR pilot is located southwest of Edmonton in the Pembina Field (Figure 1). Penn West is injecting CO2 into the Upper Cretaceous Cardium Formation sandstone at an approximate depth of 1650 m. Overlying and underlying the Cardium sandstone and conglomerate are thick sequences of Colorado Group shale. The stress and geomechanical characterization was performed on a regional scale covering the Pembina Field (Figure 1). Stress Regime Regional-scale studies of the stress regime indicate that in southern and central Alberta the vertical stress (Sv) is the largest principal stress, being greater than the maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) (Bell and Bachu, 2003). The estimation of the minimum horizontal stress (SHmin) and Sv in a well provides loose lower and upper bounds for the fracturing pressure in that well. The Sv magnitude is calculated by integrating the bulk density log from ground surface to the depth of interest. In the Pembina field there are six wells that have been analyzed for Sv (Figure 2). The trend of the Sv magnitude follows the trend of formation depth, which increases from northeast to southwest. The Sv gradient ranges between 22.2 kPa/m and 24.2 kPa/m. The minimum horizontal stress can be evaluated using a variety of tests. The most accurate method for estimating the magnitude of the SHmin is through micro-fracture testing, but mini-fracturing, leak-off tests and fracture breakdown pressures are also used (Bell, 2003; Bell & Bachu, 2003). Given that horizontal stress magnitudes tend to decrease as reservoir pressure is depleted, it is necessary to account for depletion effects when interpreting data from any of these tests.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».