MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1979798125 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2007.0007

Victorian Literature and Periodicals: Mid-Victorian Culture Wars and Cultural Negotiations A Graduate Seminar

2006· article· en· W1979798125 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linda K. Hughes

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVictorian literatureNegotiationHistoryNewspaperLiteratureCultural studiesRepresentation (politics)Victorian eraAssertionRealismSociologyMedia studiesArt historyLawArtPoliticsAnthropologySocial sciencePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Victorian Literature and Periodicals:Mid-Victorian Culture Wars and Cultural Negotiations A Graduate Seminar Linda K. Hughes (bio) "It is well recognized by scholars across the disciplines . . . that periodicals offer a clear and very special window into the life and thought of the Victorian age." – J. Don Vann and Rosemary T. VanArsdel, Preface, Victorian Periodicals: A Guide to Research, 1978 (ix) "In the nineteenth century the newspaper became an increasingly central element in the representation of everyday reality, in creating the code of realism that affected the way readers conceived and perceived the world." – Christopher Kent, "Victorian Periodicals and the Constructing of Victorian Reality," Victorian Periodicals: A Guide to Research, Volume 2, 1989 (4) During the 11 years between the first and second guides to research in Victorian periodicals published by J. Don Vann and Rosemary T. VanArsdel, a sea change occurred. As the above epigraphs indicate, periodicals were earlier seen as essential sources or background material for understanding Victorian literature and history; by the end of the 1980s periodicals were understood to construct, not merely reflect, the culture within which historical events and literary texts took shape. The shift imparts added force to George Saintsbury's assertion in 1896 that the most "distinctive and characteristic" literary genre of the nineteenth century is the periodical (166).1 The importance of "source material" has not, to be sure, been entirely superseded in current research and teaching. Michael Lund and I would have found it difficult to assert the literary and cultural significance of installment literature in The Victorian Serial (1991) without notices of serials published in the weekly press. The reprinting of numerous periodical essays in recent [End Page 317] appendices to Norton Critical and Broadview editions of Victorian titles also suggests the continued utility of periodical essays as background material in teaching. But the newer understanding of periodicals as a shaping force of Victorian literature and culture has made them increasingly central to Victorian studies as well as to the emergent field of book history. Since the 1980s I had taught serialized literature (e.g., Vanity Fair or Sartor Resartus) in parts, and in one Introduction to Poetry course I even assigned photocopies of the 1858 Atlantic Monthly installments of Arthur Hugh Clough's Amours de Voyage as a required text (a brave experiment I did not repeat). But I had never taught a course focused explicitly on periodicals either at the undergraduate or graduate level. When in Fall 2002 I returned to teaching from a year-long sabbatical I embraced the fresh start that sabbaticals encourage and designed a graduate seminar that would serve both as a literature course and an introduction to periodical studies. Such an approach seemed well adapted to Texas Christian University's graduate program, in which approximately half the students specialize in literature, half in rhetoric and composition. The latter students are deeply interested in discursivity as such (that is, the production of writing and its encoded cultural assumptions), as well as in the linguistic, social, and individual factors that mediate its production. Literature students are not uninterested in such matters but typically select a national literature and historical period within which they freely fashion (like rhetoric and composition students) a methodological and theoretical approach. To students contemplating specialization in Victorian literature the relevance of periodicals was clear, but all literature students could learn something about the link between literary and material production. Rhetoric and composition students, who at TCU are required to take some literature courses just as literature specialists study rhetoric and composition, would encounter a manifest site of discursivity and, more specifically, a range of rhetorical modes adopted by journalists, politicians, critics, novelists, poets, artists, professors, and more. The periodical, in other words, could serve as an interdisciplinary bridge within the department as well as without, in Victorian studies and book history at large. A number of pedagogical and pragmatic factors affected my course design. My desire to introduce students to intersecting texts and discourses – which immediately revealed the social situatedness of writing – was central, as was my desire to provide adequate breadth for prospective nineteenth-century British literature specialists. At the same time, the course needed to be sufficiently focused so...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,077
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,201

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0240,012
Communication savante0,0160,009
Science ouverte0,0020,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetAmerican and British Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207