MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1980377648 · doi:10.1002/jso.20632

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer prior to liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases does not adversely affect peri‐operative outcomes

2006· article· en· W1980377648 sur OpenAlexaff
Ajay Sahajpal, Charles M. Vollmer, Elijah Dixon, Elisa Chan, Alice C. Wei, Mark S. Cattral, Bryce Taylor, David Grant, Paul D. Greig, Steven Gallinger

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Surgical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Établissements canadiensMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineColorectal cancerAffect (linguistics)ChemotherapyOncologyPeriInternal medicinePerioperativeHepatectomyResectionCancerGeneral surgerySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy is being used increasingly in patients with colorectal cancer. The effects of prior systemic adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy on morbidity following hepatic resection for metastases are not well defined. OBJECTIVES: To assess the peri-operative impact of systemic chemotherapy on liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases. METHODS: Ninety-six resections for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases performed from July 2001 to July 2003 (93% > or =2 segments) were reviewed. Pre-operative demographics, peri-operative features, and post-operative outcomes were collected prospectively. Type of chemotherapy and the temporal relationship of chemotherapy to the liver resection were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 96 patients (55%) received a mean of 5.7 cycles (6.1 months) of systemic chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection, with a median interval of 12 months from end of chemotherapy to liver resection (range 1-75 months). Thirty-five received 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) alone, nine had irinotecan (CPT-11) in addition to 5-FU/LV, and nine were not specified. Pre-operative age, sex, co-morbidities, ASA score, biochemical and liver enzyme profiles, tumor number, and extent and technique of hepatic resection were the same in the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts. Mean tumor size was smaller (4.5 cm vs. 5.8 cm) and synchronous metastases were half as common (25% vs. 49%) in the chemotherapy group. Liver resection operative time was equivalent (270 min) in the two groups. Higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (1,000 ml vs. 850 ml), but fewer transfusions (23% vs. 15%) were associated with the chemotherapy group. Although not statistically significant, post-operative liver enzyme peaks were higher in the chemotherapy group (AST = 402 U/L vs. 302 U/L, P = 0.09 and ALT = 433 U/L vs. 312 U/L, P = 0.1). Peak changes in INR and serum bilirubin did not differ. Complications and length of stay (LOS) did not differ between the groups. The only post-operative death was in the non-chemotherapy group. Interestingly, hepatic steatosis was present in 28% of the non-chemotherapy cases and 57% of the chemotherapy resection specimens (P = 0.005) and was marked (>30%) in 7% and 10%, respectively. Further analysis of the chemotherapy group based on the interval between completion of chemotherapy and the hepatic resection (<6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, and >2 years) revealed a trend towards worse outcomes in most categories for those in the >2 years cohort. When comparing the 5-FU/LV alone, to the CPT-11 group there were no significant differences except higher intra-operative blood loss in the group receiving 5-FU/LV alone (1,295 ml vs. 756 ml, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite variations in biochemical function and hepatic steatosis, short-term clinical outcomes are not affected by the administration of chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection. Furthermore, there is no detrimental effect of close timing of chemotherapy prior to resection, and there are no appreciable differences between irinotecan containing regimes and more traditional 5-FU-only based therapies, although the subset sample sizes were small in this study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,672

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,353
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations58
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Surgical OncologyMême sujetHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisTravaux en français237 207