Another legacy for Canada's 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games: applying an ethical lens to the post-games' sled dog cull
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In the spring of 2010, approximately two months after the conclusion of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (Winter Olympics) held in British Columbia, Canada, approximately 100 sled dogs were culled in what the media quickly dubbed a 'massacre'. A sled dog tour company had overestimated the tourism draw and demand of the Winter Olympics and was consequently 'over-stocked' with sled dogs. This paper takes a case study approach to examine the sled dog culling through the ethical lenses of utilitarianism, rights and ecofeminist theory. The application of these three perspectives provides evidence that the behaviour of both the sled dog tour company and the employee who carried out the killings was morally wrong. The implications of this case study are far reaching; the tourism industry can no longer afford to ignore the ethical elements that relate to the industry's use and, frequently, abuse of non-human animals. The recent interest by tourism scholars in the ethical aspects of the industry's use of non-human animals is timely. This under-researched topic of study will benefit from more scholarly interest and study, particularly as it relates to the effectiveness of codes of ethics and conduct, corporate social responsibility programmes, and the practicality and value of incorporating ethical education and training into these various programmes. Keywords: ethicsutilitarianism theoryrights theoryecofeminist theorynature-based tourismsled dogsOlympicsBritish Columbia Notes While the terms 'ethics' and 'morals' are often used interchangeably, they are, in fact, quite different by definition. For the purposes of this paper, ethics are seen to be guidelines for how an individual should behave within society. Morals, on the other hand, are seen to be that which is good or right in an individual's character or conduct and are influenced by one's culture. The term 'ethics' is more commonly associated with society, whereas the term 'morals' is more commonly associated with the individual. See http://theflume.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=7470; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/17/starving-sled-dogs-seized_n_396469.html; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/08/samuel-walker-gets-90 day_n_820180.html?ref=fb&src=sp#sb=1314454,b=facebook; http://www.adn.com/2010/03/01/1163218/17-year-olds-dog-dies-on-the-trail.html http://www.nnsl.com/frames/newspapers/2005-02/feb2_05dg.html; http://www.whistlerquestion.com/article/20090325/WHISTLER01/303259833/1030/WHISTLER/spca-probes-two-dog-sled-operations; http://news.seppalasleddogs.com/blog/2006_02.html; http://www.helpsleddogs.org/ See Sled Dog Task Force for their 10 recommendations (http://www.gov.bc.ca/agri/down/sleddog_taskforce_report_25mar11.pdf).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle