MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1981072999 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1370

1597 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS

2012· article· en· W1981072999 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marco Bianchi, Maxine Sun, Quoc‐Dien Trinh, Jens Hansen, Zhe Tian, Niccolò Passoni, Alberto Briganti, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Paul Perrotte, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Urology · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCystectomyMedicineBladder cancerContext (archaeology)PopulationDemographyCancerHistoryInternal medicineArchaeologySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Invasive II1 Apr 20121597 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS Marco Bianchi, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Jens Hansen, Zhe Tian, Niccolò Passoni, Alberto Briganti, Shahrokh Shariat, Paul Perrotte, Francesco Montorsi, and Pierre Karakiewicz Marco BianchiMarco Bianchi Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Maxine SunMaxine Sun Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Quoc-Dien TrinhQuoc-Dien Trinh Detroit, MI More articles by this author , Jens HansenJens Hansen Hamburg, Germany New York, NY More articles by this author , Zhe TianZhe Tian Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Niccolò PassoniNiccolò Passoni Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Alberto BrigantiAlberto Briganti Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Shahrokh ShariatShahrokh Shariat Detroit, MI More articles by this author , Paul PerrottePaul Perrotte Montreal, Canada More articles by this author , Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author , and Pierre KarakiewiczPierre Karakiewicz Montreal, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1370AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Previously, an association between female gender and higher mortality rates in the context of bladder cancer (BCa)has been suggested. However, no existing study adjusted for competing risk of mortality. In consequence, we sought to examine the impact of gender in patients diagnosed with non-metastatic (BCa) at radical cystectomy (RC) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in a stage-adjusted competing-risks survival analyses. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, we retrospectively identified 12843 patients diagnosed with pT1-4N0-3M0 BCa (1988-2006). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses predicting the rate of non-organ confined disease (pT3-4N0 or N1-3) at RC were fitted. Competing-risks regression analyses assessed the independent predictor status of gender on CSM. Covariates comprised age, race, pathological stage, tumor grade, socioeconomic status (SES), year of surgery, as well as other-cause mortality (OCM). Separate models were fitted according to stage of the disease and SES. RESULTS Overall, the prevalence of BCa was highest in males (75%). However, females were more likely to be older at diagnosis (mean 69 vs. 67 years, p<0.001), to be of black race (8 vs. 4%, p<0.001) and to harbor non-organ confined disease at diagnosis (39 vs. 35%, p<0.001). In multivariable analyses predicting the rate of non-organ confined disease at RC, women were significantly more likely to harbor non-organ confined disease (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, P=0.01) than their male counterparts. Overall, the five-year CSM rates for female vs. male were 33 vs. 23% (HR: 1.22, P<0.001). In patients with organ-confined disease (pT1-2N0), the five-year CSM rates for female vs. male were 22 vs. 17% (HR: 1.24, P<0.001). In patients with non-organ confined disease (pT3-4N0-3), the five-year CSM rates for the same groups were 46 vs. 40% (HR: 1.22, P<0.001). In multivariable competing risk analyses, women were more likely to die of CSM than their male counterparts, after adjusting for OCM (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22, P<0.001). Similarly, in patients with pT1-2 and pT3-4N0-1, female gender portended to a 1.24- and 1.22-fold higher rate of succumbing to CSM than their men counterparts, respectively (all P<0.001). Finally, in patients with low and high SES status, female patients were 1.31 and 1.15-fold more likely to die of CSM than their men counterparts (both P≤0.02). CONCLUSIONS Women were more likely to harbor more advanced disease at RC. Even after adjusting to OCM and other covariates, female gender was associated with an increased risk of CSM. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byUhlig A, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Simon J, Lotz J, Trojan L, Schmid M and Uhlig J (2018) Gender Specific Differences in Disease-Free, Cancer Specific and Overall Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 1, (48-60), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e646 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Marco Bianchi Milan, Italy More articles by this author Maxine Sun Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Quoc-Dien Trinh Detroit, MI More articles by this author Jens Hansen Hamburg, Germany New York, NY More articles by this author Zhe Tian Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Niccolò Passoni Milan, Italy More articles by this author Alberto Briganti Milan, Italy More articles by this author Shahrokh Shariat Detroit, MI More articles by this author Paul Perrotte Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author Pierre Karakiewicz Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of UrologyMême sujetBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207