MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1981183569 · doi:10.1353/utq.2006.0096

Negotiated Memory: Doukhobor Autobiographical Discourse (review)

2006· article· en· W1981183569 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Vicki S. Hallett

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeCollective memoryBiographyContext (archaeology)DiasporaHistoryAutobiographical memoryIdentity (music)Life writingLiteratureResistance (ecology)SociologyAestheticsGender studiesLinguisticsPhilosophyArtArt historyLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Negotiated Memory: Doukhobor Autobiographical Discourse Vicki S. Hallett (bio) Julie Rak. Negotiated Memory: Doukhobor Autobiographical DiscourseUniversity of British Columbia Press. xvi, 166. $85.00, $29.95 Who are the Doukhobors? How have they been known to themselves and to Canadian society? In what ways have their autobiographical narratives been constitutive of and constituted by a unique cultural history of diaspora and marginalization in both Russia and Canada? In answering these questions, Julie Rak takes us not only on a historical journey through Doukhobor collective memory, but also into the complicated terrain of autobiography theory. The journey begins with an introduction to the particulars of the Doukhobors' century-old history in Canada. What follows is an elucidation of pertinent aspects of their culture, such as their strong identification with oral narrative and Christianity, resistance to all forms of state authority, and commitment to passivism and communal living. According to Rak, it is these aspects of Doukhoborism that have made them 'bad subjects' of the Canadian nation, in an Althusserian sense, and that make their uses of autobiography so unconventional and fascinating. Rak continually circles back to these key aspects of Doukhoborism to make the case that theirs is a unique epistemology, one which lends itself to 'collective identifications that can ... signify a site of identity formation alive to its context and to the conditions of its production.' Hence, the autobiographical endeavours of the Doukhobors, found in recorded oral narratives, interviews, and prison writings, in many ways fall outside traditional (Western) definitions of the genre. Thus, they challenge the boundaries of what autobiography can be and do. I think Rak's recognition of these challenges is part of what makes the text an important contribution to autobiography theory. This is especially true in the Canadian context, where, as the author mentions, 'studies of alternative autobiographical forms and subjects are still rare.' I particularly enjoyed Rak's discussions of subjectivity, identity, and autobiography. The points she most effectively makes are that these elements are all complexly intertwined with community memory in Doukhobor life writing/orating, and that the results can serve as effective resistance to cultural erasure and political marginalization. Also well executed is her argument that Doukhobor autobiography constitutes a difficult set of negotiations both within and beyond their [End Page 200] cultural communities. According to Rak, Doukhobors have used autobiographies as a means to have intergenerational and international dialogues about what their identities signify for themselves. In addition, they have used them as 'strategies of visibility' in a Canadian public context that has often sought to keep Doukhobors invisible and silent. Slightly less effective is the case she makes for Doukhobor autobiography as performative. While I appreciated her use of Sidonie Smith's and Judith Butler's complex theories, I would disagree with the binary she imposes upon certain Doukhobor (Freedomite) writings as 'exterior and public' versus Smith's and Butler's versions of perfomativity as 'interior and private.' Butler, in particular, invokes the very public citation of societal norms as an essential component of its largely involuntary execution. Also, I would have appreciated a more in-depth discussion of Rak's motivations for taking on this project and its political implications for her as a non-Doukhobor. While she does mention the work of other scholars who have written on issues of appropriation and representation, this does not suffice as an explicitly feminist analysis. In addition there were certain places where I felt the use of explanatory footnotes would have been helpful. Rak makes culturally specific references to things such as the 'Small Party' and 'Brilliant' without giving us enough relevant information. Despite my criticisms, I think that this will be a useful and informative text for students of Canadian studies, as well as those interested in critical autobiography and identity theory. As a person fascinated by the workings of memory and storytelling in relation to identity and subjectivity, I was particularly pleased by the way these themes were evoked throughout the text. Rak does a very good job of navigating the complex topography of Doukhobor autobiographical discourse within the Canadian historical landscape. Ultimately, this is an excursion worth taking. [End Page 201] Vicki S. Hallett Vicki...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,972
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,056

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→