Teaching & Learning Guide for: The Social Ethic of Religiously Unaffiliated Spirituality
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Author's Introduction Historically, spirituality has almost always been embedded in religion, but in the years following the 1960s counterculture, spirituality has also forged an existence outside traditional theologies. It is now increasingly common for people to describe themselves as ‘spiritual but not religious’, signalling their move away from traditional religious hierarchies towards an eclectic, self‐governing approach to existential meaning‐making. Spirituality today emerges from a complex socio‐religious matrix that is closely linked to the rise of individualism in affluent western nations. The social and religious implications of the cultural ethic of individualism have been much discussed. This essay adds another perspective by considering whether religiously unaffiliated spirituality contributes to the creation of an integrated society, and leads to the development of civically engaged and responsible citizens compared with organized religion. Online Materials 1. http://www.cbc.ca/podcasting/indes.html?newsandcurrent#tapestry Tapestry is a CBC radio programme exploring spirituality and religion. Podcasts available for download. 2. http://www.thearda.com/ The Association of Religion Data Archives features high‐quality empirical data on the American religious landscape. See especially the learning modules to learn how to best use the data available on this website ( http://www.thearda.com/learningModules/ ) 3. http://www.givingandvolunteering.ca/pdf/CSGVP_Highlights_2004_en.pdf Caring Canadians Involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2004 Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating 4. http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks TED talks (technology, entertainment and design) features video presentations (each about 20 min) by highly accomplished, and often high profile individuals. Geared to a sophisticated global audience, its speakers frequently epitomize a post‐materialist vision of how to build a better future. Sample Syllabus 1. Introduction to contemporary spirituality Albanese, C, ‘Introduction’, in American Spiritualities: A Reader , pp. 1–17 (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press, 2001). Roof, WC, Chapter 1 ‘Varieties of Spiritual Quest’, in Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion , pp. 16–45 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1999). 2. The sociology of spirituality1960–1980: the Counter‐culture and the New Age Movement Roof, WC, Chapter 2 ‘The Making of a Quest Culture’, in Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion , pp. 46–76 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1999). Ferguson, M, Chapter 1, ‘The Conspiracy’, and Chapter 2, ‘Premonitions of Transformation’, in The Aquarian Conspiracy: Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980s , pp. 23–64 (Los Angeles, CA, J.P. Tarcher Inc.). Websites of interest: The New Age today http://www.newage‐journal.com/ http://www.fairycongress.com/fc2008/2008_links.htm http://www.aerious.org/index.html http://www.findhorn.org/ http://www.hollyhock.ca 3. Defining spirituality and religion Marler PL, & Hadaway, K, ‘“Being Religious” or “Being Spiritual” in America: A Zero‐Sum Proposition?’ Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , vol. 41, no. 2 (2002), pp. 289–300. Heelas, P, & Woodhead, L, ‘Introduction’, and Chapter 1, ‘Distinguishing religion and spirituality’, in Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality , pp. 1–32 (Oxford, Blackwell, 2005). 4. Broad‐based spirituality movement from 1980 onward (2 weeks) Roof, WC, Chapter 3 ‘The Spiritual Marketplace’, and Chapter 5, ‘A Quest for What?’ in Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion , pp. 77–110 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1999). Roof, WC, Chapter 5 ‘A Quest for What?’ in Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion , pp. 145–179 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1999). Heelas, P, & Woodhead, L, Chapter 4 ‘Bringing the Sacred to Life’, in Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality , pp. 77–110 (Oxford, UK, Blackwell, 2005). Roof, WC, Chapter 6 ‘Redrawing the Boundaries’, in Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion , pp. 180–216 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1999). Websites and media of interest: The Templeton Foundation:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,406 | 0,323 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».