Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Benjamin Disraeli Letters. Volume 7: 1857–1859 Richard Rempel (bio) Benjamin Disraeli. Benjamin Disraeli Letters. Volume 7: 1857–1859. Edited by M.G Wiebe, Mary S. Millar, Ann P. Robson, and Ellen Hawman University of Toronto Press 2004. lxvi, 578. $185.00 The editors of volume 7 of the Benjamin Disraeli Letters have maintained the distinguished scholarly standards that have characterized every previous volume. Indeed, the depth of knowledge demonstrated in the editorial material, especially the annotations, has surpassed all other volumes in this series. As usual, they have provided a succinct, penetrating introduction and chronologies, both of Disraeli's political life during the period under scrutiny and of the number, dates, and recipients of his epistolary offerings. The letters reveal his capacity for terseness when dealing with national and local Conservative party issues, his capacity for businesslike prose when [End Page 457] informing Queen Victoria and Lord Derby of quotidian and forthcoming foreign and domestic problems, and his personal concerns for long-time correspondents and friends, notably Sarah Brygdes Willyams and Lady Londonderry. Moreover, the sheer range of his correspondence is astonishing, given that he had to deal with almost all questions of party patronage and electoral details, regular letters to the Queen, pleas to recalcitrant, often testy peers, such as Lord Stanley and Lord Lytton, and even lengthy, self-deprecating epistles to William Gladstone requesting that he renounce their long personal rivalry and, in the national interest, join Lord Derby's Cabinet. Indeed, the volume contains 670 letters of which 457 have never been published, in whole or in part. These letters will be invaluable, indeed essential, for all of Disraeli's future biographers. Current biographies, alas, are markedly deficient in dealing with these years of Disraeli's career. As the editors emphasize, this period as a whole has generally been 'neglected or dismissed as unimportant' by historians. Yet the dilemmas over electoral reform characterize these years while in the realm of imperial and foreign problems these were the years that witnessed the 1857 India Mutiny, the intervention of Emperor Napoleon iii in a war against Austria over the issue of Italian unification and yet another conflict with the decaying Chinese Empire. At home, British legislators and London residents confronted the 'Great Stink' of July 1858 when the smell of the polluted Thames caused Disraeli, Gladstone, and other mps to become ill in the House of Commons. Then on 6 June 1859 Whigs, Liberals, and Radicals met in Willis's Rooms to co-operate in what was to become the Victorian Liberal party, the emerging powerful adversary of the still quarrelsome, disunited Conservatives. The editors are correct in arguing that these letters, whatever they reveal about Disraeli's political frustrations, demonstrate that during these years he was purposely preparing the Conservative party to attain power with clear domestic, imperial, and foreign directions. Disraeli's letters also indicate clearly his utilization of the changing technology of the day, notably his reliance on the telegraph, increasingly speedy train service, and even the transatlantic cable. On some major issues of this time these letters demonstrate that Disraeli was farsighted, notably in his views on the India Mutiny. Writing to Mrs Willyams on 23 September 1857, he observed that the 'Indian news is most grave ... But of all the awful circumstances of this terrible affair, is the spirit of vengeance, wh: is preached – as if we were to take our enemies for our model. In a political, a military, a religious, point of view, nothing can be more unwise, or more heinous.' Later, to Lord Stanley in 1858, Disraeli demonstrated how he believed what had happened in India could be avoided in Britain. 'No Government can stand that is supposed to slight the religious feelings of the country. It is as important to touch the feelings & [End Page 458] sympathy of the religious classes in England as to conciliate the natives of India.' These letters convey concisely Disraeli's conservative beliefs. Disraeli's views on the necessity for some vital version of reform pervade this volume. As the editors summed up 'the tone' of the letters in this Volume: 'We must accommodate the settlement of 1832 to the England of...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,038 | 0,026 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».