Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Carnivorous reptiles exhibit a massive increase in oxygen demand following a meal to meet the increased metabolic demands associated with digestion. Inherently, this increase in oxygen demand places an extra demand on the cardiovascular system; the heart needs to work harder to transport more oxygen to the metabolically active digestive organs. Pythons appear to deal with this increased cardiac demand by substantially increasing the mass of their heart(cardiac hypertrophy) within two days of feeding. But just how do these snakes manage to pump up their heart's mass?Andersen and colleagues at the University of California, Irvine, were interested in determining the cause of the cardiac hypertrophy following feeding in the python (Python molurus). They wanted to know if the increase in heart mass was due to increased protein synthesis (i.e. formation of new heart muscle) or a water shift between extracellular and intracellular compartments, leading to increased fluid content of the heart tissues. In order to investigate this, Andersen and colleagues obtained ventricles from three groups of pythons: (1) fasting (these snakes had been fasted for 28 days); (2) digesting (these animals had digested a large meal 2 days earlier);and (3) post-digestive (these pythons had digested a large meal 28 days earlier). For each of these groups, the team measured ventricular dry/wet mass ratio, the ventricle's total protein, RNA and myofibrillar protein concentrations on a mass-specific basis, and the expression of messenger RNA for heavy-chain cardiac myosin, a contractile element of the heart.As they expected, the team observed a 40% increase in pythons' ventricular mass during digestion. They identified several clues that this hypertrophy was due to de novo protein synthesis and not increased fluid content of the heart. Primarily, the team found that the expression of messenger RNA for heavy-chain cardiac myosin increased significantly 2 days after feeding,indicating that digesting snakes synthesise myosin. Further, they discovered that the hearts' mass-specific total protein, RNA and myofibrillar protein concentrations did not change during digestion. In other words, as the pythons' hearts increased in mass after feeding, the ratio of protein to heart mass remained the same, indicating that new protein was being formed as the hearts expanded. This finding also ruled out increased water content as an explanation for the cardiac hypertrophy; if the increased heart mass was due to an increase in fluid content, these mass-specific protein concentrations would have decreased. Finally, they found that ventricular dry/wet mass ratio did not differ between fasted and fed snakes, providing further evidence that the larger hearts were not due to increased water content. The team concluded that the cardiac hypertrophy observed in digesting pythons is due to the synthesis of new contractile protein.Additionally, the team showed that the increase in heart mass during digestion was a fully reversible process. The mass of post-digestive snakes'hearts was similar to the mass of fasted snakes' hearts. Thus, following a meal, a python can rapidly increase its heart size by 40% and then decrease it again within 28 days. In comparison with mammalian species, in which comparable increments in ventricular size take weeks to develop, this cardiac remodelling occurs very rapidly. As such, Andersen and colleagues stress that this natural, rapidly occurring and fully reversible cardiac hypertrophy could provide a useful model for investigating the mechanisms that lead to cardiac remodelling and growth in other animals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».