THE CHALLENGE OF COMBINING EASE OF USE WITH DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITY IN AN CONCUSSION ASSESSMENT TOOL
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Concussion in sport is an injury which until recently was dealt with on a qualitative basis, with physicians basing diagnoses and treatment plans on experience and clinical judgment. Hence, the need for a standardized, scientifically proven, and generally accepted protocol for concussion assessment and treatment has been demonstrated. A critical review of the existing literature on neuropsychological testing was undertaken. Based on the data, the McGill on field exam was developed and used since 1998. The goal of this project was not to revisit the content of that document. Instead, we want to convey our experience with the format of this evaluation form, with the assumption that conclusions we have reached may be applicable and of interest to others who are using similar evaluation testing. In order to obtain a review of the Concussion On Field Exam, systematic interviews were conducted with doctors and physiotherapists. Specifically, questions were chosen so as to stimulate the interviewee to think about the exam from various angles, and to thus constructively criticize the degree of user-friendliness associated with the tool on several different levels û namely the introduction, presentation and method of use of the form. Finally, in asking questions which pertained to specific portions of the form, or specific situations of use, the interviewees were given the opportunity to structure their reflections and thus consider very precise problems that they might have been neglected in a more general review. One of the most prevalent desires expressed by the individuals interviewed was that clear, explicit instructions be provided with the Concussion On Field Exam. The other concern regarding the Concussion On Field Exam that was raised was that there was no practical method of recording the results of the test in the on field trauma situation. Although the results obtained from this study, then, reflected opinions regarding one particular concussion assessment protocol, we believe that many of the expressed problems and concerns are much more general in nature. Hence, any recommendations expressed herein are at once particular to the McGill Concussion On Field Exam, and yet can also be generalized to apply to other diagnostic tools which are similar in nature, purpose, or method.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle