Risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-based cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A recent hospital-based study suggested a 10-fold increased risk of pulmonary embolism among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the year following hospital admission. It is unknown whether the risk is similar among the nonhospitalized SLE population. We estimated the risk of incident pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) events, as well as the associated time trend, among incident cases of SLE compared with general population controls using physician billing and hospitalization data for the entire province of British Columbia, Canada (~5 million). Our data included all visits to health professionals and hospital admissions covered under the province's universal healthcare plan from 1 January 1990 until 31 December 2007 for all individuals ≥18 years of age. We conducted a matched cohort study among patients meeting the following criteria: ≥18 years of age, and new diagnosis of SLE based on the following algorithm: one ICD code for SLE on rheumatologist visit billing data or on hospitalization data, or two ICD codes for SLE at least 2 months and no more than 2 years apart on a physician visit by a nonrheumatologist. Controls were selected from the general population, on a 10:1 ratio for each case, matched by birth year, sex and calendar year of exposure. The outcomes, PE and DVT, we identified based on one ICD code for PE in hospitalization data; and one ICD code for DVT in either outpatient or hospitalization data. We estimated relative risks (RRs) of PE and DVT in SLE cases compared with matched general population controls, after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, trauma, fracture, surgery, and hospitalizations. Among 5,156 individuals with SLE, 54 developed PE and 92 developed DVT. Compared with age-matched, sex-matched, and entry-time-matched controls ( n = 51,560), the RRs were 4.9 (95% CI = 3.4 to 6.8) for PE and 4.5 (95% CI = 3.5 to 5.7) for DVT. These RRs attenuated slightly after adjusting for covariates, but remained significant (Table 1 ). When we evaluated the impact of follow-up time, the RRs for PE, DVT and PE or DVT in SLE patients as compared with non-SLE cases were the largest in the first year (Table 2 ). The estimates decreased over time and were not significant after 5 years of follow-up with the exception of DVT. This is the first population-based study assessing the risk of PE and DVT in patients with SLE. These findings support increased monitoring of venous thromboembolic complications and risk factors in SLE patients, especially during the first year after disease onset.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».