Field Implementation of Solvent Aided Process
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The authors have previously described a Solvent Aided Process (SAP) that aims to combine the benefits of SAGD and VAPEX. In SAP, a small amount of hydrocarbon solvent is introduced as an additive to the injected steam during SAGD. While steam is intended to be the main heat-carrying agent, the solvent will dilute the oil to reduce its viscosity over and above what is accomplished by heating alone. The overall effect should be an improved oil to steam ratio (or reduced energy intensity). Although promising based on the authors' calculations, the process has not been previously applied or tested on a field scale. This paper describes the implementation of a SAP pilot at Encana's Senlac Thermal Facility. In addition to dwelling on some of the important parameters of a SAP test, it discusses the design considerations for the field pilot and the necessary modifications to an existing SAGD plant, specifically in the area of boiler operations controls. Although the design calls for an assessment of reservoir performance results on a longer-term basis, initial results from this pilot look very encouraging. The oil rates have shown a substantial increase, and the steam-oil ratio has shown a corresponding decrease. This paper also discusses directional economics with SAP and its beneficial impact on the environment. Introduction Just as steam tackles the viscosity reduction of in situ oil in SAGD(1,2) by heating it, solvents(3–7) do this by diluting the oil. Although employment of both steam and solvent together has been discussed in the literature(8–15), these discussions have mostly focused on enhancement of steam-flood or steam-stimulation. In their discussion on the subject, Gupta et al.(16) described SAP as a process enhancement to SAGD where a small amount of a light alkane solvent, namely propane, butane, pentane, etc., or a mixture thereof, is added to the injected steam. They also suggested, with the help of lab experiments and numerical modelling, that SAP has the potential to substantially improve the performance of SAGD. Expected SAP Advantages Figure 1 shows a comparison of an expected numerically obtained oil rate profile from a SAGD application vs. one obtained similarly with the application of SAP in the same reservoir. It is assumed that SAP would start after the expiry of a certain initial period in the life cycle of SAGD to allow for the initial development of the chamber with steam. The units from the rate and time axes are omitted to emphasize the general nature of these profiles. The comparison of the rate profiles is provided in order to suggest that the bulk of the oil that would have been produced in the later period with SAGD can be produced sooner with SAP. The acceleration of production and the corresponding cash flow could lead to improved economics for the project. Apart from the improved economics as a consequence of production rate acceleration, the other expected advantages of SAP include reduced environmental impact, possible down-hole upgrading of the heavy oil, and a small increase in the ultimate recovery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».