The Encyclopedia of Girls' School Stories , and: The Encyclopedia of Boys' School Stories (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Encyclopedia of Girls' School Stories, and: The Encyclopedia of Boys' School Stories Lisa Rowe Fraustino (bio) The Encyclopedia of Girls' School Stories. By Sue Sims and Hilary Clare. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2000 The Encyclopedia of Boys' School Stories. By Robert J. Kirkpatrick. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2000 The titles of these two companion books about the British school story are far less interesting than the material between the covers. They are the types of reference books that scholars might pluck from the library stacks while looking for something else and wind up browsing through for hours, so filled are they with interesting details. Each book begins with a Preface by editor Rosemary Auchmuty that describes why she considers the work "pioneering," since the school story has not been considered a genre worthy of scholarly study until fairly recently. Just as today's adult critics tend to overlook or deride popular series fiction that children themselves adore, the school story in its heyday was the object of critical antagonism. However, contemporary critics are now turning their attention to the social, cultural, and political impact of the thousands of school stories published in Britain between the mid-1800s and the 1940s, and girls' school stories are "of particular significance for the social and cultural history of women" (Preface vii). The Acknowledgements in these encyclopedias describe the process by which the authors solicited information and contributions from numerous sources and experts. The Introductions by the authors survey the material, providing a crash course in the historical, thematic, and theoretical development of the genre of British school stories. Along the way, the surveys point out important authors, titles, and publication issues. In the girls' encyclopedia, Auchmuty includes an additional section called "The Critical Response," in which she objects to the academic community's past record of "condemning girls' stories for repetitive plot-lines, stereotyped characters, false values, lack of reality and so on," and she lauds recent scholars who have used a feminist approach to counter the negative stereotypes (19). The largest section in each book consists of an alphabetical listing of authors, ranging from very brief entries of a paragraph or so to lengthier essays of several pages for authors such as Elinor Brent-Dyer and Thomas Hughes, who made the most significant contributions. Entries are also included for Canadian, Australian, and New Zealand authors whose school stories were published in Britain. Each entry includes biographical information, a general description of how the author's work fits within the genre, some critical analysis of particular titles deemed especially important or influential within the genre or within the broader field of children's literature, and a bibliography of the author's school-related books and magazine publications. Many authors wrote both girls' stories and boys' stories and appear in both encyclopedias. As remains the case in children's literature, the majority of authors were women (often using initials or male pen names to disguise their gender), with a number of men writing for boys but few men writing for girls. The encyclopedias end with sections on general topics such as adult school fiction, annuals and anthologies, ballet school stories for girls, "penny dreadfuls" for boys, evangelistic school stories, school story papers, and others. Bibliographies of scholarly sources provide a good starting point for further research. Though it is undeniably necessary to learn about the marginalized position of the school story within British children's literature criticism, the point was made repetitively, especially regarding the girls' stories. I found the defensive posture rather shrill and annoying at times, for the analysis of the genre's importance and influence is strong enough to stand on its own merits. Nevertheless, these encyclopedias were a massive undertaking and provide a wealth of background information to scholars interested in studying the impact of the British school story on children's literature. [End Page 47] Lisa Rowe Fraustino Lisa Rowe Fraustino is an active member of the ChLA and the author of several books for children and young adults, most recently The Hickory Chair, named a Blue Ribbon Book by the Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books. She teaches at Wyoming Seminary...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».