MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1981773361 · doi:10.1159/000357739

Overview of MS Spasticity

2014· article· en· W1981773361 sur OpenAlex
Carlo Pozzilli

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Neurology · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpasticityPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMultiple sclerosisMedicineNeurosciencePsychologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Spasticity is one of the most frequent symptoms associated with MS and yet it is often overlooked and poorly managed. Possible reasons for this include the different understanding of the definition of spasticity, ranging from the exploratory rigidity perceived by a healthcare professional to the multiple related symptoms felt by patients, and also the different clinical assessment tools which do not always take into consideration the patient's perception of their disease. Another contributing factor is the limited effectiveness and tolerability profiles of most of the currently available agents [1]. A number of large studies have shown that spasticity produces some of the most common and disabling symptoms associated with MS, occurring in up to 80% of affected MS persons [2,3,4]. Between 30 and 50% of MS patients rate their spasticity as moderate to severe [3], and some of the most commonly reported associated symptoms included rigidity, spasms, pain, worsening of movement difficulties and/or urinary dysfunction and sleep disturbances. The extent of the burden placed on MS patients who reported spasticity, compared with patients who did not experience spasticity, in terms of spasms, urinary dysfunction and sleep disturbances in a recent study is highlighted in table 1[4].The effect of spasticity on mobility is one of the most disabling changes associated with MS and it has a marked negative impact on patient well-being and quality of life [4,5,6]. It also increases the cost-burden associated with MS, with an increased need for physiotherapy and caregiver support [6]. Figure 1 highlights the strong correlation between worsening of spasticity and reduced walking ability.While there is a clear impact of spasticity on the overall well-being of MS patients, the available evidence demonstrates a limited effectiveness of the classic first-line treatment options such as baclofen, tizanidine, gabapentin, and others [1,6]. Thus, there is an obvious unmet need for better therapeutic options for physicians and this is highlighted by the findings of a recent German survey which reported that in patients with moderate spasticity about 40% of physicians were unsatisfied or completely unsatisfied with current antispasticity therapies. In patients with severe MS spasticity about 60% of physicians were unsatisfied or completely unsatisfied with current treatments [6] (fig. 2).New guidelines for the management of MS have been developed in Spain (fig. 3) [7] and Germany and both contain algorithms for managing MS spasticity [7]. Baclofen and tizanidine remain the first-line treatment options in both sets of guidelines for the management of generalised MS spasticity, and both recognise the role of the new THC:CBD oromucosal spray as a second-line option for patients with moderate to severe treatment-resistant MS spasticity.This supplement provides an insight into the latest clinical evidence concerning THC:CBD oromucosal spray (Sativex®), a unique cannabinoid-based medicine comprising a 1:1 mixture of 9-delta-tetrahydocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). THC:CBD oromucosal spray acts as an endocannabinoid system modulator, and it is indicated as add-on treatment for symptom improvement in adult patients with moderate to severe spasticity due to multiple sclerosis (MS) who did not adequately respond to previous antispasticity therapy, and who demonstrated a clinically relevant response during a one month trial. At the present time, Sativex® is available in 17 European countries and it is also available in countries such as Australia, Canada and Kuwait.Spasticity is one of the most common symptoms associated with MS, and in 30-50% of the affected patients it is rated as moderate to severe. Symptoms include spasms, and worsening of pain, movement difficulties, sleep disturbances, urinary dysfunction and disability and these result in an increased need for caregiver support, reduced well-being and quality of life, and an increased burden on families, friends and the healthcare system. There is a clear unmet need for more effective treatments and recent guidance recognizes the need for evidence-based support for the management of MS spasticity. Guidelines from Spain and Germany recommend baclofen and tizanidine as first-line options and acknowledge the available evidence supporting the use of THC:CBD oromucosal spray recommending it as a second-line option for patients with treatment-resistant spasticity. C. Pozzilli received an honorarium from Laboratorios Almirall, SA, for his participation in the Symposium and producing his article, which is included in this Supplement. He has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. Writing assistance was provided by Content Ed Net, with funding from Laboratorios Almirall, SA.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,489
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,475

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle