Identification of <b> <i>vat</i> (E-3), a Novel Gene Encoding Resistance to Quinupristin-Dalfopristin in a Strain of <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> from a Hospital Patient in the United Kingdom </b>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Quinupristin-dalfopristin is a mixture of semisynthetic streptogramins A and B that was recently licensed for clinical use in the United States and Europe (3). A related antibiotic, virginiamycin, has been used as a growth promoter for production animals in Europe and the United States, although its use was banned in the European Union in July 1999. Virginiamycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains have been isolated from exposed farm animals, raw meat, and hospital patients and are cross-resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin (1, 2, 5; L. B. Jensen, A. M. Hammerum, F. M. Aarestrup, A. E. van den Bogaard, and E. E. Stobberingh, Letter, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:3330–3331, 1998; G. Werner, I. Klare, and W. Witte, Letter, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17:401–402, 1998). Resistance to streptogramin A is a prerequisite for resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin and virginiamycin and is mediated in E. faecium by vat(D) (previously satA) or vat(E) (previously satG), two plasmid-mediated genes that encode acetyltransferases that inactivate streptogramin A (4; G. Werner and W. Witte, Letter, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1813–1814, 1999). Available vat(E) sequences are not identical, and we propose designating the alleles in the order of their deposition in the GenBank database: vat(E-1) (accession numbers {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF139735,term_id:5353576}}AF139735, {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF229200,term_id:7595743}}AF229200, and {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF242872,term_id:9246952}}AF242872) and vat(E-2) ({type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF153312,term_id:6690519}}AF153312). vat(E-2) differs from vat(E-1) by three nucleotides (99.5% identity), which are predicted to result in two amino acid substitutions (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Two other alleles, each differing from vat(E-1) by two nucleotides, have been reported but have not yet been deposited in GenBank (6). FIG. 1 Comparison of the amino acid sequences of alleles of the Vat(E) streptogramin A acetyltransferase (see the text for GenBank accession numbers). We have previously detected vat(E) by PCR in isolates of quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant E. faecium (MIC ≥ 32 μg/ml) from animals and raw meat (n = 10) and also from hospital patients in the United Kingdom (n = 4) (5). A 512-bp internal fragment of vat(E) was amplified from these isolates (5) and subjected to direct cycle sequencing using an ALFexpress DNA sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, St. Albans, United Kingdom) and a Thermo Sequenase fluorescence-labeled primer cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The sequences, which represented 80% of the vat(E) gene, were compared with those of vat(E-1) and vat(E-2). The sequences of the PCR products from 13 isolates were identical to vat(E-1). However, one isolate, designated E. faecium A41, from a hospital patient, yielded a distinct sequence. Two overlapping fragments of the vat(E) allele from this strain were amplified and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands) to yield recombinant plasmid pARL00.31, containing the 512-bp fragment, and pARL00.38, containing a 300-bp fragment spanning the 3′ end of vat(E) and extending 137 bp downstream of the stop codon. The latter fragment was amplified with primers 5′-CCA ATT CAA CTC ATC GGA CC-3′ and 5′-TAC GAG TAG AGT ACC GCC AG-3′ and corresponded to nucleotides 4063 to 4362 of GenBank sequence {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF242872,term_id:9246952}}AF242872. For each fragment, the inserts of three separate clones were sequenced in both directions using a Dye-Labeled ddNTP Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Beckman Coulter UK Ltd., High Wycombe, United Kingdom) and samples were analyzed on a CEQ 2000 automated sequencer (Beckman). Fragments were assembled with ContigExpress (InforMax Inc., Oxford, United Kingdom). The vat(E) allele from E. faecium A41 has been designated vat(E-3) and deposited in GenBank under the accession number {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AY008284,term_id:12383031}}AY008284. It had 20 nucleotide changes (4% divergence) compared with vat(E-1). Fifteen of these changes were silent, but the others resulted in five previously undescribed amino acid substitutions (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The predicted Vat(E-3) peptide had 97% amino acid identity with Vat(E-1) and 96% identity with Vat(E-2). In comparison with sequences downstream of vat(E-1) and vat(E-2), the sequence immediately downstream of the vat(E-3) stop codon had a single base insertion (an additional C after nucleotide 4235 of GenBank sequence {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF242872,term_id:9246952}}AF242872) and two substitutions (both T→C changes at nucleotides 4227 and 4253 of GenBank sequence {type:entrez-nucleotide,attrs:{text:AF242872,term_id:9246952}}AF242872). We have confirmed the allelic nature of vat(E) apparent in GenBank submissions and previous reports (2, 6). The vat(E-1) allele was present in all vat(E) PCR-positive E. faecium strains from nonhuman sources studied here and in three of the four clinical isolates. The fourth clinical isolate harbored vat(E-3), which showed greater sequence divergence from vat(E-1) than other previously reported alleles (20 versus 2 or 3 nucleotide changes). In conclusion, isolates of quinupristin-dalfopristin- and virginiamycin-resistant E. faecium that give a vat(E)-specific PCR product should not be assumed to carry identical alleles. Furthermore, we suggest that the epidemiological significance of a vat(E)-positive PCR result cannot be judged accurately in the absence of sequence data.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».