Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ANTOON A. LEENAARS, SUSANNE WENCKSTERN, ISAAC SAKINOFSKY, RONALD J. DYCK, MICHAEL. J. KRAL, and ROGER C. BLAND (eds.) Suicide in Canada Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998, xxiv + 488 pp. (ISBN 0-8020-7791-9, C$29.95, Softcover) Reviewed by KEITH DOBSON Suicide in Canada is a major volume dedicated to an acute public health phenomenon in this country. book is divided into nine sections. Although there is overlap among the sections, they retain distinctions that warrant their separation. sections (history; epidemiology and the Canadian scene; theory and research; first nations and Inuit; family, community, and government approaches; youth suicide, schools, and communities; distress centers; survivors; the right to die) are laid out in a logical order. Each section has three or four chapters, and among these chapters are some that provide a theoretical approach to the issue, and others that focus on distinctively Canadian experiences or themes. Where possible, the editors have obtained experts on suicide in this country to write about programs, policies, or local initiatives, thus providing a Canadian focus to the book. For example, in the section entitled The Right to Die there is extensive discussion of the Sue Rodriguez case and its legal, moral, and practical implications. volume is appealing for its use of chapters that vary from being very formal and research focused, to those that are highly experiential and voiced in the first person. For example, the chapters in the sections on epidemiology, theory, and research are generally focused on the description of average tendencies, statistical summaries, and on developing and testing theoretical models of suicide. In large measure, except for the Canadian emphasis in epidemiology, these chapters could appear in any sound academic treatise on the nature of suicide. In contrast, the section on suicide among first nations and Inuit people makes greater use of narrative and descriptions of experience. Although one could argue that a certain unevenness emerges as a consequence of the different ways in which these chapters are written, it must be recognized that our understanding of different aspects of suicide is itself not even and that varied approaches to understanding this phenomenon are therefore justified. Further, with no less than 57 individual contributors to this volume, there is little surprise that different writers have elected to use different methods for writing and presenting their contribution. reader of this volume is led ineluctably to the following conclusions: -Suicide is, or ought to be, a very real concern in contemporary Canadian society. -Although rates of suicide vary among different groups within Canada, their rates have remained fairly constant over time. - Certain populations are especially at risk (e.g., first nations and Inuit people; youth; survivors of suicide; the terminally ill) and demand concerted efforts at understanding and intervention aimed at the special circumstances that put them at higher risk of suicide than the population at large. - Our models of understanding and intervention with suicide, while certainly now more advanced than in previous years, are still not adequate to respond to the challenge of suicide in Canada. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,014 | 0,030 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».