Analysis of Transient Pressure Response Near a Horizontal Well-A Coupled Diffusion-deformation Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Analysis of transient pressure response near a horizontal well has been based largely upon the analysis of mathematical solutions for the diffusivity equation. The diffusivity equation satisfies the principle of mass conservation, but does not consider the principle of equilibrium. No deformation properties of reservoir are included in the diffusivity equation. However, in some deformable reservoirs, the stress and deformation caused by injection or production could be so significant that it might affect the pressure response. This paper presents analyses of transient pressure response near a horizontal well using a coupled diffusion-deformation method. The results are compared with those obtained from the single diffusivity equation. Implications on practical applications such as well testing are addressed. Introduction Reliable information about in situ reservoir conditions is important in many phases of petroleum engineering. Much of the information can be obtained from well testing by measuring the variations in wellbore pressure that result from changes in the operating condition of the well. For example, pressure transients measured at an injecting well (under constant injecting rate) after it is shut in can be used to estimate the permeability of the reservoir. Well testing theory is based largely upon the solutions for the diffusivity equation, the differential equation for fluid flow in porous medium. Traditionally, it is assumed that the permeability, porosity and compressibility of fluid are constant, and pressure gradient is small(1,2). In fact, the change in fluid pressure is related to the change in the volume of fluid and reservoir rock. In order to obtain a better insight into the reservoir properties, two mechanisms should be considered in the interaction between the interstitial fluid and the porous rock:an increase of pore pressure induces a dilation of the rock; andcompression of the rock causes a rise of pore pressure, if the fluid is prevented from escaping the pore network. On the other hand, if pore pressure induced by compression of the rock is allowed to dissipate through diffusive fluid mass transport, further deformation of the rock progressively takes place. The earliest theory to account for this coupled diffusion-deformation mechanism was developed by Biot(3) who proposed a theory for three-dimensional consolidation of soils. Terazghi(4) developed a model for one-dimensional consolidation of soils. Rice and Cleary(5) linked the theory of poroelasticity to the concepts in rock mechanics with the full account of fluid and solid grain compressibility's. The objective of this paper is to study the effects of coupled diffusion-deformation mechanisms and compressibility's of fluid and grain on the pressure response near a horizontal well. Numerical cases in oil sand and sandstone reservoirs are generated to investigate the above effects, using a coupled numerical simulator. Then, the results are compared with those from the well testing method. Analysis Methods Single Diffusion Equation (Well Testing Analysis Technique) In 1967, Matthews and Russell(2) published their monograph dealing with well testing and analysis, which became a standard reference for many petroleum engineers. The basic fluid diffusion equation is a combination of the law of conservation of mass, Darcy's law, and state equation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».