Flue Gas Injection Into a Mature SAGD Steam Chamber at the Dover Project (Formerly UTF)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The Dover Project (formerly the Underground Test Facility) is the world's first field pilot of the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process using dual horizontal well pairs to recover bitumen. There have been four phases of SAGD piloting at the Dover site thus far. The Phase B pilot, which consists of three 500 m long horizontal well pairs spaced 70 m laterally apart, has been in continuous operation since early 1993. Phase B reached the peak production rate of 300 m3/d or 100 m3/d per well pair on average in the middle of 1994. After sustaining the peak rate for about two years, the production has been in decline with a steady increase in steam-oil ratio. Research carried out in the past few years suggested that the addition of a suitable amount of non-condensable gases (NCG) would be an effective method to wind-down the steam chamber. It provides an economic means to continue bitumen production by utilizing the large amount of heat stored in the SAGD chamber. Beginning in April 1998, a small amount of natural gas was added continuously to the steam injection. The concentration of NCG has increased steadily in the past 3.5 years. The resulting performance has been better than initially expected. Based on the success of this NCG-steam wind-down strategy, a four-month flue gas injection test was conducted in 2001 to investigate the possibility of using the more cost-effective flue gas, rather than natural gas as an injectant. This paper summarizes the rationale for selecting the NCG-steam wind-down strategy, the field implementation of the flue gas injection test, and the resulting pilot performance. The successful implementation of this technology will have a profound impact on the overall process economics. Introduction The Dover Project is an in situ bitumen recovery facility on the Oil Sands Lease Number 328 located 70 km northwest of the City of Fort McMurray. It was initiated by Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority (AOSTRA) in 1984 and was ater joined by industry participants to pilot the SAGD processsing dual horizontal wells. The Dover Project Area is located in eight sections of land at the extreme eastern edge of the lease, as shown in Figure 1. To the immediate east of Dover is Petro-Canada's MacKay River Project, which is expected to produce 30,000 BOPD using the SAGD process in 2003. Several papers(1–3) have been published to describe, in detail, the Dover Project from the beginning until mid-1997. The following is a brief summary. FIGURE 1: Dover project area. Available in Full Paper. The first phase of testing, Phase A, involved the drilling of horizontal wells from a limestone tunnel network located about 20 m below the oil sand formation. These well pairs had a horizontal length of about 60 m and were spaced 25 m apart, as shown in Figure 2. They were operated from 1987 to 1991. Encouraged by the results from Phase A, the Project proceeded to the secondphase of piloting in late 1991.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».