Notice bibliographique
Résumé
At an editorial board meting in January, Dr. Strauch is presented with a plaque by Dr. Daniel Schiff, Vice President and Publisher Journals, Thieme, to commemorate his achievement with the journal. People make contributions in many ways. The contributions most of us make to our sphere of activity are unifocal and unifaceted. In the field of reconstructive microsurgery, there are enough star players to fill a “Hall of Fame.” Names like Buncke, O'Brien, Harii, and Tamai represent our pioneers, and there are many others. All of these individuals have made monumental contributions and have helped develop this exciting field for the following generations. Among all the pioneers, there is one who deserves to be singled out and some of his contributions acknowledged. That individual is the founder and Editor in Chief of this journal, Dr. Berish Strauch. Like many of the pioneers, Dr. Strauch has made major contributions to the field. His bibliography contains over 100 peer-reviewed publications as well as the three-volume Grabb's Encyclopedia of Flaps (with Drs. Vasconez and Hall-Findley), the Atlas of Microvascular Surgery: Anatomy and Operative Approaches (with Dr. Yu), the Atlas of Hand Anatomy and Clinical Implications (with Drs. Yu and Chase) and the Symposium on Microsurgery (with Dr. Daniller). In the arena of organized medicine, Dr. Strauch was a founding member and later President of the International Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery and the American Society for Peripheral Nerve, and he served as president of the New York Society for Surgery of the Hand. He also had the prescience to organize the first meeting of what would become the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery and served as the first president of that organization. I think you'll agree that such a long list of contributions to the science, communication, and organization of our subspecialty is unprecedented, a truly multifocal and multifaceted contribution. You are currently reading Volume 23, Number 3 of the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery . This journal is in the 23rd year of its existence, and a look at the table of contents of this issue, or indeed any previous issue, bears testament to the fact that this truly is an international journal. It is a major means of communication for the global microsurgical community. Dr. Strauch had the foresight to establish this journal and with his Associate Editor, Dr. Lee Landers, ran the journal out of his office in the Bronx since its inception. With Dr. Landers' retirement in December, Dr. Strauch made the decision to step down as Editor-in-Chief and give the journal to the society he founded, the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery. This will be the last issue listing Dr. Strauch as Editor-in-Chief. I think we all owe him an enormous debt. Dr. Strauch will be maintaining his interest in the journal as Editor Emeritus, and I know that I will certainly be calling on him for advice and direction. I feel very fortunate to have been chosen to succeed Dr. Strauch as Editor-in-Chief, but I take on the job with the realization that his act will be impossible to follow. Thank you, Dr. Strauch, on behalf of us all.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,047 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,012 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,096 | 0,086 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».