MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1983870666 · doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00649_1.x

Educational concerns of nurses around the world

2008· editorial· en· W1983870666 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane Robinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Nursing Review · 2008
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWorkforceGlobal healthNursingHealth careInternational healthRelevance (law)Work (physics)Occupational health nursingHealth educationHealth promotionDeclarationHealth policyMedicinePublic relationsPolitical sciencePublic health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fadwa Affara's guest editorial on the Islamabad Declaration on Strengthening Nursing and Midwifery describes the results of a high-level consultation on two resolutions passed by the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2006. This issue also focuses on the 2006 WHA resolution themes, particularly ‘Towards a scaling-up of education and training for health workers’. It results from collaboration with the on-line journals Human Resources for Health (http://human-resources-health.com) and Education for Health (http://www.educationforhealth.net), and is an example of INR's links with other international journals to highlight matters of global concern in health. The World Health Report 2006, Working Together for Health, recognized the centrality of the health workforce for the effective operation of country health systems (WHO 2006). The Report emphasised that the crisis in developing countries derives principally from inadequate educational opportunities for health workers and a lack of relevance of their training to community health care practice. The importance of education and training is also highlighted in Juan Somavia's definition of ‘Decent Work’ formulated by the International Labour Organization and its support of nursing through the Nursing Personnel Covention 1977 (no.149). He discusses the need for decent work for the global health workforce in an interview on page 136. The current issue offers a collection of articles that illustrate nurses' immediate educational concerns from around the world. They reflect many of the themes that can be found in Working Together for Health and draw our attention to local issues that are also of global concern. Paying attention to these concerns might go some way to alleviating the health workforce crisis that currently preoccupies governments across the world. Needs assessment, competency development, local and international collaboration, and career development are overlapping themes in these articles. Four articles focus on widely different health needs' assessment. A Jordanian article on health workers' hepatitis training needs identifies that two-thirds of 339 workers surveyed did not have adequate and current training in this vital area of health protection. Other articles cover the need to develop appropriate curricula to help nurses deliver youth-friendly reproductive services in Swaziland; to bring Turkish occupational health nurses' training in line with World Health Organization recommendations; and, finally, to develop cultural competence amongst nurses in the Republic of Ireland, which is moving from a mono- to a multi-cultural society. Competency development is specifically explored in three articles that range from the inter-jurisdictional regulation of entry-level competencies in Canada; to the development of managerial competencies in Georgia; to the practice level of manual blood pressure measurement in Greece. Collaboration between nurses from different countries and agencies to support nursing education and development is reported in articles from Tajikistan and Vietnam. The opportunities and constraints for professional-client cooperation are described in an account of Finnish primary school nurses' contacts with the pupils' parents. Many lessons on the challenges and opportunities for collaboration in educational development can be found in the findings of a review that identifies significant and promising progress in the development of international nursing curricula through cooperative partnerships. Finally, very different aspects of nursing career development can be found in two articles; one following the trajectory of migrant Romanian nurses in Italy, and the second on doctoral prepared nurses in Denmark. Scaling-up of education and training for health workers clearly demands an overview of international, national and local health and educational needs. These articles show that the ‘one size fits all’ model is probably inadequate, for nurse education around the world is at very different stages of development and achievement. Nevertheless, the many examples of international thinking and collaboration that they contain offer hope for the future. Nurses' willingness to cooperate and learn from each other and others is one of the most rewarding lessons to emerge from this collection of articles.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,149
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,067
Tête enseignante GPT0,537
Écart entre enseignants0,470 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Nursing ReviewMême sujetGlobal Health Workforce IssuesTravaux en français237 207