MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1983891157 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v3n1p121

On Patterns of Refusals Conversion and Propensity of Converted Refusals to Respond at Later Waves in a Longitudinal Survey

2011· article· en· W1983891157 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olaniyi Mathew Olayiwola, Godwin N. Amahia, A.A. Adewara

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProxy (statistics)Stratified samplingDemographyPsychologySample (material)Logistic regressionPropensity score matchingStatisticsMathematicsSocial psychologySociologyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When a selected sample member refuses to take part in a survey interview, the survey organization may not accept therefusal as a final outcome, but rather to make further attempts to convert the refusals into an interview. The aim of thisstudy was to investigate the pattern of refusals conversion and the propensity of the converted refusals to respond at laterwaves in a longitudinal survey. A two-stage stratified randon sampling scheme was used with households in Oyo as thesampling unit. A sample of 750 households were randomly selected from the community and sub-divided into five equalgroups with each group treated as a wave. The recording schedule was used to obtain information on demographic characteristicsincluding survey process, external environment, age, gender, educational qualification, religion, employmentstatus, family size, duration of interview and the type of questions. The data were collected through oral interview of thesubjects. Summary statistics were constructed to look at the patterns of conversion of refusals. Logistic model was fittedto investigate the propensity of converted refusals to respond at later waves following a conversion. At wave 1 of thesurvey, 109 house heads were interview in households with a response rates (in percentage) of 72.67.The interview periodwas an average of 8 minutes per house head. The response rate at wave 2, wave 3, wave 4 and wave 5 were 82, 81.33, 82and 80.67 respectively. Outcomes of a conversion attempt were a full interview and a proxy interview. Five house headswent through the conversion process at wave 1 and data were successfully collected on 2 of them (40%). All of them wereinterviewed again at wave 2 (100%). Those converted refusals at wave 1, 100% gave a full interview six months later. Forhouse heads who were converted between wave 1 and wave 5 continued to give full interviews at every wave up to wave5. For all other waves, the converted refusals participated throughout the survey. Logistic model showed that, those whowere converted to a full interview rather than proxy interview were the most likely to give a full interview at subsequentwave. When we included in the model, information on the wave in which the initial conversion was took place and thetime since conversion, we found that those whose initial conversions were in earlier and later waves were less likely togive a full interview compared with those were converted at wave 3. Adding demographic information suggested thatmale, people with their ages between ((30 − 50) years, respondents with primary education were likely to take part againfollowing a conversion.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,114
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,082
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,976

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,1140,032
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,691
Tête enseignante GPT0,529
Écart entre enseignants0,162 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Mathematics ResearchMême sujetSurvey Methodology and NonresponseTravaux en français237 207