Emergency tracheal intubation using a gum elastic bougie through a laryngeal mask airway
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Emergency airway management often occurs out of hours when only less experienced staff are available and immediate access to equipment may be delayed. We wish to report such a case. A 74-year-old female with severe rheumatoid arthritis and acute left sided lobar pneumonia was referred to us for respiratory support. Airway assessment revealed a severe fixed flexion deformity of her neck, a receding mandible with a thyromental distance of 2 cm, an interincisor distance of 3 cm, and partial dentition. She was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for awake fibreoptic intubation. However, as she was wheeled through the doors of the unit she suffered an asystolic cardiorespiratory arrest. Manual ventilation with 100% inspired oxygen via a facemask and oropharyngeal airway together with atropine 3 mg i.v. restored her cardiac output and heart rate. She remained unresponsive, however. Direct laryngoscopy proved difficult in view of her anatomical abnormality and she was found to be Cormack and Lehane grade 4 [1]. A size 3 classic laryngeal mask airway (LMATM, Intavent Orthofix, Maidenhead, UK) was inserted and ventilation improved marginally. As the fibreoptic laryngoscope was not yet available, a gum elastic bougie was passed blindly through the laryngeal mask airway and into the trachea, as confirmed by resistance to advancement at approximately 30 cm. The laryngeal mask airway was removed and a size 7.0 mm tracheal tube was railroaded over the bougie and controlled ventilation established. A lateral neck X-ray taken following intubation revealed the severity of her disease (Fig. 5). In view of the likelihood of prolonged ventilation and concerns over the consequences of accidental extubation, an early tracheostomy was performed by the ENT surgeons, with some technical difficulty, on day 2. Lateral neck X-ray postintubation showing the severity of the fixed flexion deformity. This case illustrates several points regarding difficult airway management. Firstly, there was a lack of appreciation of potential airway difficulties by non-anaesthetic staff. Clearly, this patient should have been referred before she was in extremis when a more controlled approach to airway management could have been employed. Second, difficult airway equipment including fibreoptic scope and airway adjuncts such as intubating laryngeal mask airways should be immediately available in ICU at all times. This is particularly important as the ‘awaken patient’ scenario proposed for ‘can’t intubate, can't ventilate (adequately)' elective theatre patients [2] is often not an option for patients referred to ICU. Intubation of the difficult elective airway by blindly passing a gum elastic bougie into the trachea via a regular laryngeal mask airway has been previously described [3]. Allison reported a success rate of 88% in elective cases [4] but subsequent studies have reported much lower success rates of 20–28%[5, 6]. As a result, it has been concluded that this technique is unreliable and not recommended as part of the failed intubation drill. Variable success rates for blind intubation 30–90% passing a tracheal tube via the classic laryngeal mask airway have also been reported [7–9]. It has been suggested that insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway may be easier than conventional laryngeal mask airway in patients with a fixed flexion deformity [10, 11]. The Difficult Airway Society guidelines suggest that fibreoptic brochoscopy via an intubating laryngeal mask airway and railroading of the tracheal tube followed by cricothyrotomy if unsuccessful, might have been the option of choice for our patient [2]. This is a technique that demands practice in elective cases prior to attempts in the emergency situation. Our decision to attempt blind bougie passage resulted from the gravity of the situation and the lack of other immediately available equipment. We recommend that, as the technique is simple and quick, it could still be considered in such cases while other emergency equipment is being prepared. However, it should not delay attempts at other techniques with potentially a higher success rate. The need for rehearsal of such difficult airway drills and the need to educate our non-anaesthetic colleagues cannot be overemphasised.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».