MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1984316857 · doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.639885

Cognate awareness -raising in late childhood: teachable and useful

2012· article· en· W1984316857 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLanguage Awareness · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueSecond Language Acquisition and Learning
Établissements canadiensConcordia University
Organismes subventionnairesUniversität Kassel
Mots-clésCognatePsychologyMetalinguisticsLinguisticsFrenchMetalinguistic awarenessRaising (metalworking)Mathematics educationPedagogyTeaching methodVocabulary development

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This study is part of a larger investigation of the usefulness of instruction designed to raise cross-linguistic awareness in young Francophone learners of English in Quebec. In the research reported here, the focus is on cognates. Since previous research shows that learners typically fail to recognise many helpful similarities between words in a new language (in this case, English) and languages they already know, the instructional activities we designed emphasised strategies for identifying 'good friend' resemblances, though false friends were also discussed. The impact of the activities was assessed in three ways: learners' performance on a measure of French–English cognate recognition ability; their written responses to a question that probed developing cognate awareness; and interviews that explored teachers' experiences after using the activities in their classes. Findings suggested that learners benefited from the activities. Gains on the recognition test pointed to an advantage for 'pattern' instruction that addresses resemblances that are not readily detected (e.g. English screen = French écran). Learners who received the experimental instruction outperformed control groups on the cognate awareness measure. Furthermore, teachers were positive about the cross-linguistic comparisons. We conclude that the activities were effective and even enjoyable. Keywords: cognate awareness -raisingcross-linguistic contrastsESLexplicit instructionteacher perceptionsmetalinguistic awareness Acknowledgements This paper is based on a presentation the authors made at the 10th International Conference of the Association for Language Awareness, held at the University of Kassel in July, 2010. The research was supported through a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We would like to thank our project manager, Philippa Bell, our statistical advisor, Randall Halter, the graduate students who helped with data collection and analysis and, of course, the teachers and ESL learners who participated in this study. We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Notes 1. In addition to subject-specific competencies, nine cross-curricular competencies grouped in four categories (intellectual, methodological, personal and social, and communication) aim to promote integrated learning. A competency is defined as 'a set of behaviours based on the effective mobilisation and use of a range of resources' (QEP, Citation2001, p. 4). 2. While this is the case for most teachers, our paper will be about another context. 3. It was necessary to convert mean scores to percentages as the number of general and pattern cognate items differs (8 and 12, respectively). 4. Each intensive teacher has two groups of students in one year; she teaches the first group from September through January and the second group from February through June. At the time this interview was conducted, T5E had just finished implementing the experimental materials with her first group and was starting to teach her second intensive group of the year. 5. In the regular program, students have one hour a week of English in grades 1–6 and 2.5 hours a week in secondary school. By the time they reach Secondary 3 (Grade 9), they have had approximately 400 hours of instruction, distributed over eight years. Students in an intensive ESL program have almost 400 hours in five months.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,281
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,989

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle