Letter: A Reliable Method of Applying a Circumferential Dressing
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Sir The correct application of a dressing to a wound postoperatively is almost as important as the procedure itself. This is especially true in the field of plastic surgery where flaps and skin grafts are involved in wound repair. Wound dressing is important as it acts as a barrier to protect the wound from infection and physical damage. However, when applied incorrectly with excessive pressure, wound healing can be impaired. In cases of flap resurfacing of a wound, the applied dressing must be of adequate pressure yet not excessive enough to impair the blood flow and hence flap viability. Securing the dressing to a wound can potentially cause excessive pressure to the wound. Amongst all the various methods of securing a dressing, wrapping a bandage around a limb circumferentially has the highest risk of applying excessive pressure on the wound. This excessive pressure can lead to either venous congestion or occlusion of the arterial supply to the underlying flap, which can result in partial or complete flap loss (1,2). To our knowledge, no standardised technique has been described to dress a flap reconstruction wound circumferentially around the limb with an adequate amount of pressure. We propose a simple and adequate method of circumferential dressing on a flap reconstruction on a limb. We place an intact roll of a regular 6-in. crepe bandage on top of the wound covered with loose gauze before applying the circumferential bandage (Figure 1). Before securing the final wrap, we remove the roll of bandage. In this way, by creating an extra space between the flap wound and the bandage, we create enough slack so that the circumferential dressing does not occlude the flap or its pedicle, yet secure enough to protect the flap. Interposing of a roll of crepe bandage while applying a circumferential bandage. This technique hence uses an easily available material and is a simple and a reliable way of ensuring that the same amount of circumferential pressure is correctly applied to all limb wound reconstruction with flaps. This ensures the adequate circulation and safety to the underlying flap. Respectfully submitted,Syed Abuzar Mashhadi 1 , MBBS, FRCS-ed, FRCS-Plast Charles Yuen Yung Loh 2 , MBBS(UCL) This institution work is attributed to Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. No financial support or benefits have been received by me or any coauthor, by any member of my (our) immediate family or any individual or entity with whom or with which I (we) have a relationship from any commercial source which is related directly or indirectly to the scientific work which is reported on in the article except as described below. I (we) understand an example of such a financial interest would be a consulting relationship or stock interest in any business entity which is included in the subject matter of the manuscript or which sells a product relating to the subject matter of the manuscript.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle