Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Editorials21 January 2014Taking the Bite Out of Rabies, Putting Teeth Into “One Health”David N. Fisman, MD, MPHDavid N. Fisman, MD, MPHFrom Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M13-2821 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Rabies is a scourge to humans and animals that was first mentioned in medical texts as early as the sixth century BCE. The development of rabies vaccines by Pasteur in the late 19th century provided a potent tool for protection of both animals and humans (1). Canine rabies has been eliminated from many high-income countries, and human rabies cases are vanishingly rare in Canada and the United States, largely because of requirements for vaccination and the availability of postexposure immunization protection when exposure (to rabid feral animals) does occur.The situation is different in many low- and middle-income countries, where ...References1. Osler W. Specific Infectious Diseases: XXIV. Hydrophobia. The Principles and Practice of Medicine. 2nd ed. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1897:177-80. Google Scholar2. World Health Organization. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies. Second report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2013;:1-139. [PMID: 24069724] MedlineGoogle Scholar3. Morters MK, Restif O, Hampson K, Cleaveland S, Wood JL, Conlan AJ. Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction. J Anim Ecol. 2013;82:6-14. [PMID: 23004351] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. World Society for the Protection of Animals. Ending Inhumane Culling. 2013. Accessed at www.wspa-international.org/ending-inhumane-culling/default.aspx on 30 November 2013. Google Scholar5. Fitzpatrick MC, Hampson K, Cleaveland S, Mzimbiri I, Lankester F, Lembo T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of canine vaccination to prevent human rabies in rural Tanzania. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:91-100. LinkGoogle Scholar6. Pitman R, Fisman D, Zaric GS, Postma M, Kretzschmar M, Edmunds J, et al; ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force. Dynamic transmission modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force—5. Value Health. 2012;15:828-34. [PMID: 22999132] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Lloyd-Smith JO, George D, Pepin KM, Pitzer VE, Pulliam JR, Dobson AP, et al. Epidemic dynamics at the human-animal interface. Science. 2009;326:1362-7. [PMID: 19965751] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Kaplan B. One Health or ... some health? Vet Ital. 2011;47:129-31. [PMID: 21706464] MedlineGoogle Scholar9. Matthews L, Low JC, Gally DL, Pearce MC, Mellor DJ, Heesterbeek JA, et al. Heterogeneous shedding of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and its implications for control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:547-52. [PMID: 16407143] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Broder CC, Geisbert TW, Xu K, Nikolov DB, Wang LF, Middleton D, et al. Immunization strategies against henipaviruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012;359:197-223. [PMID: 22481140] MedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: David N. Fisman, MD, MPHAffiliations: From Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDisclosures: None disclosed. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M13-2821.Corresponding Author: David N. Fisman, MD, MPH, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Room 678, Toronto ON M5T 3M7 Canada; e-mail, david.fisman@utoronto.ca. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoCost-Effectiveness of Canine Vaccination to Prevent Human Rabies in Rural Tanzania Meagan C. Fitzpatrick , Katie Hampson , Sarah Cleaveland , Imam Mzimbiri , Felix Lankester , Tiziana Lembo , Lauren A. Meyers , A. David Paltiel , and Alison P. Galvani Correction: Taking the Bite Out of Rabies, Putting Teeth Into “One Health” Metrics Cited byRabies – epidemiology, pathogenesis, public health concerns and advances in diagnosis and control: a comprehensive reviewCorrection: Taking the Bite Out of Rabies, Putting Teeth Into “One Health” 21 January 2014Volume 160, Issue 2Page: 132-133KeywordsEnvironmental healthHealth economicsImmunityInfectious diseasesPopulation statisticsPrevention, policy, and public healthRabiesRural areasVaccinesZoonoses ePublished: 21 January 2014 Issue Published: 21 January 2014 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2014 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».