MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1985850797 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0218

The Hanging of Angelique: The Untold Story of Canadian Slavery and the Burning of Old Montreal , and: Crossing the Border: A Free Black Community in Canada (review)

2009· article· en· W1985850797 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gregory Wigmore

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryOpposition (politics)DominionHavenMythologyLawClassicsPolitical sciencePoliticsArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Hanging of Angelique: The Untold Story of Canadian Slavery and the Burning of Old Montreal, and: Crossing the Border: A Free Black Community in Canada Gregory Wigmore The Hanging of Angelique: The Untold Story of Canadian Slavery and the Burning of Old Montreal. Afua Cooper. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2007. Pp. 360, $59.95 cloth, $19.95 paper Crossing the Border: A Free Black Community in Canada. Sharon Hepburn. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007. Pp. 272, $40.00 cloth A survey conducted by the Dominion Institute a few years ago revealed that 51 per cent of Canadians correctly identified the Underground Railroad as the route American slaves used to escape to Canada – the same percentage who could name John A. Macdonald as the first prime minister and more than double the number who could list the country’s four original provinces. In a nation often faulted for forgetting its past, the Underground Railroad remains central in Canadians’ historical memory. Yet, despite that act of remembrance, a great deal remains forgotten or shrouded in myth. While several historians have explored the subject of Canadian slavery, it still seems quite possible, as James W. St G. Walker observed three decades ago, for Canadian students to complete high school (and even university) believing that ‘Canada’s only relationship with slavery was as a haven for American runaways.’ For many in a nation that has long defined itself in opposition to the United States, America’s ‘original sin’ and Canada’s welcoming embrace of Black refugees seem to present a clear-cut contrast between the two nations’ histories. Recent books by Afua Cooper and Sharon Hepburn help expose such a comparison as a false contrast, and reveal a more complicated picture. Cooper’s The Hanging of Angelique explores the life and death of an enslaved Black woman convicted of arson in Montreal in 1734. Reminding readers that Canada’s connection to slavery began long before it became a haven for American refugees, Cooper reveals part of what she calls ‘Canada’s best-kept secret’: the period of state-sanctioned slavery in Canada between 1628 (when the first slave arrived in New France) and 1833 (when the British Parliament abolished slavery throughout the empire). Hepburn’s Crossing the Border focuses on the subsequent experience of African-American refugees who settled the all-Black community of Buxton in Canada West. Her study investigates just what kind of a haven freed Blacks truly found at the end of the Underground Railroad. Surviving documentary evidence on individual slaves held in Canada is fragmentary. Marie-Joseph Angelique appears prominently in the [End Page 544] historical record solely because she stood trial for a notorious crime. The fire allegedly set by the young woman in her owner’s home also consumed another forty-five buildings, leaving much of Montreal in smouldering ruins. Determined to learn all they could about the accused and the cause of the blaze, alarmed authorities spent days interrogating her. The surviving transcripts furnished Cooper with the means to accomplish a commendable feat: the production of a book-length study of an enslaved individual in Canada. Apart from the transcripts of her brutal interrogation and trial, documentary evidence of Angelique’s life remains scarce. In telling the life story of the Portuguese-born bondswoman, Cooper relies on informed speculation, frequently weighing the available evidence against the wealth of American and Atlantic world scholarship on slavery. For example, she wonders whether Angelique engaged in sexual relations with her owner, Sieur de Francheville, noting that this might account for both the violent relationship between Angelique and Francheville’s wife, Therese, and Angelique’s expectation that she would eventually be freed. (Several historians have explored the traumatic consequences of such liaisons in the households of American slaveholders, as well as the preferential treatment sometimes accorded to enslaved women who slept with their masters.) Cooper’s speculation is often compelling, sometimes convincing, but rarely conclusive. At any rate, by January 1734, the newly widowed Therese arranged to sell Angelique to a new owner in Quebec as soon as the ice thawed, prompting Angelique and her lover, a white engagé named Claude Thibault, to attempt an unsuccessful...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,496
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical Review→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→