Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In parallel with the Consensus Development Conference on Management of Chronic Hepatitis B, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) held the initial organizational steering committee meeting of the Hepatitis B Research Network. The establishment of this network was the centerpiece of a large initiative in hepatitis B that was directed at making progress in the understanding, prevention, and control of this important liver disease. This initiative was the result and a part of the Trans-NIH Action Plan for Liver Disease Research (http://liverplan.niddk.nih.gov) that was published in December 2004 and laid out a series of specific research goals for liver disease research for the next 10 years. The Action Plan represented the collective efforts of more than 250 individuals including liver research investigators, academicians, practicing physicians, researchers and representatives from industry, NIH staff, and lay advocates who worked together to prioritize liver disease research goals. The research goals were directed at specific advances that would translate into substantial improvement in the understanding, prevention, and treatment of liver diseases. Within this report, key research priorities for hepatitis B research were given in the chapter on viral hepatitis, many of which still remain incompletely resolved. To help meet these goals, the NIH sponsored this 2008 Consensus Development Conference on Management of Hepatitis B, but also set into motion a prospective clinical research network of investigators charged with the mission to provide new insights into the pathogenesis of hepatitis B and help define the most appropriate therapy of this disease in its multiple clinical forms and in the different populations that it affects. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NIDDK, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; NIH, National Institutes of Health. Robert Carithers Jr, Kris Kowdley, Brian McMahon (University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; and Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK); Adrian M. Di Bisceglie (Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO); Michael Fried (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC); Marc G. Ghany, T. Jake Liang, David E. Kleiner (NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD); Steven Han, Tram Tran, Tse-Ling Fong (University of California Los Angeles; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA); E. Jenny Heathcote, Jordan Feld, David Wong (University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada); W. Ray Kim (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN); Daryl T.-Y. Lau, Raymond T. Chung (Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA); William Lee, Robert P. Perrillo (University of Texas Southwestern and Baylor Medical Center, Dallas, TX); Anna S.F. Lok (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI); Mitchell Schiffman (Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA); Kathleen Schwarz (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD); Norah A. Terrault, Mandana Khalili, Natalie Bzowej (University of California San Francisco and California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA). Kyong-Mi Chang (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) Steven Belle (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA). From the NIDDK, Dr. Patricia Robuck serves as the Project Officer and Dr. Edward Doo as the Chief Scientific Officer. Drs. Jay H. Hoofnagle, Leonard B. Seeff, Elizabeth Wright, and Jay Everhart of the Liver Diseases Research Branch, NIDDK, serve as scientific advisors. Additional participants include representatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID). The network is charged with developing a randomized controlled trial of long-term therapy of hepatitis B as well as a large-scale prospective cohort study to follow patients with chronic hepatitis B longitudinally with the overarching goal of addressing the research priorities identified at this and prior research meetings toward the alleviation of this condition. Ancillary studies directed at elucidating the pathogenesis of the various stages and forms of hepatitis B and identifying biomarkers of disease activity and stage, as well as the conduct of smaller, more innovative trials of therapy in special populations of patients with hepatitis B, are also planned. The timing of the NIH Consensus Conference on Management of Hepatitis B was fortunate, allowing for the special focus on “Research Needs for the Future” from each speaker to provide important directions for the research agenda of the Hepatitis B Research Network. Additional information about the Hepatitis B Research Network is available on its website at www.hepbnet.org.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».