MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1986265148 · doi:10.1063/1.1580067

Jacques Pierre Friederich Sellschop

2003· article· en· W1986265148 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert John Caveney, Simon Henry Connell

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNuclear Physics
Mots-clésUnit (ring theory)MathematicsMathematics education

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Jacques Pierre Friederich “Friedel” Sellschop, a leading figure in South African and international science and a pioneer in basic and applied nuclear physics, died peacefully at home in Greenside, Johannesburg, South Africa, on 8 August 2002.Sellschop was born 8 June 1930 in Lüderitz in what is now Namibia (the photo shows him in front of the former hospital in which he was born). Sellschop completed his BSc in physics, mathematics, and geology in 1949 at the University of Pretoria and his MSc in physics in 1952 at the University of Stellenbosch. He then went to the University of Cambridge, where he earned his PhD in nuclear physics in 1958.Another great South African scientist, Sellschop’s friend and mentor Basil Schonland, encouraged him to return to South Africa. Even before Sellschop had completed his doctoral degree, he was appointed founding director of the nuclear physics research unit at the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in 1956 and thus began an association with Wits that would last more than 45 years. The research unit later became known as the Schonland Research Centre for Nuclear Sciences, in recognition by Sellschop of Schonland as one of the most eminent of South African scientists and in acknowledgment of Schonland’s help and encouragement to Sellschop over the years.At Wits, Sellschop had many administrative responsibilities. In 1959, he was appointed professor of nuclear physics and became the first holder of such a chair in South Africa. He was later appointed dean of the faculty of science (1979–83). He also served as deputy vice-chancellor of research (1984–96), his last position before retirement. In that position, he was responsible for all research and related activities at Wits and introduced systems of research evaluation and support in line with international norms.Sellschop loyally remained in South Africa despite many temptations and offers to work abroad. That loyalty was recognized at an international conference on physics held in his honor on the occasion of his 70th birthday. He also was recognized worldwide for his scientific achievements and was responsible for numerous international collaborations with scientists and technologists. His philosophy was to take advantage of the unique benefits of working in South Africa—particularly diamonds and the deep South African gold mines—and exploit them in such international collaborations.Theory had predicted that neutrinos were prolific in nature, but demonstrating their presence was another problem. Fred Reines had detected manmade neutrinos from a nuclear reactor. The next step was to detect cosmic neutrinos. In the late 1950s, Sellschop contacted Reines and suggested that the deep gold mines might be used to isolate the neutrino signal from all the other competing signals present at Earth’s surface. Reines took up the challenge, and together they began the hunt for the neutrino in nature. Sellschop could be most persuasive and his enthusiasm was catching. He used those talents to bring the mining magnates (chairman and senior directors of the East Rand Proprietary Mines) on board, and they agreed to blast out a space for the neutrino laboratory at the great depth of 3 km below the surface at the ERPM in Boksburg, east of Johannesburg. The experiment was a success, and on 23 February 1965, Sellschop and Reines unambiguously detected a naturally occurring neutrino for the first time.Sellschop also realized the potential of using diamonds in his research, both in the study of the mineral itself and in the use of it for unique solid-beam interactions. In the late 1950s, he joined a small group of scientists working in the field of diamond physics. South Africa was diamond country, and he had a close working relationship with the De Beers Diamond Research Laboratory (DRL). He also had a career-long friendship with Henry Dyer, who held positions as DRL’s director of research, managing director of De Beers Industrial Diamonds, and a director of the parent company, De Beers. Sellschop was able to get samples of this precious mineral, both natural and synthetic, more easily than any other scientist. He also persuaded De Beers to support his research, with both funding and the purchase of equipment. Together with Mik Rebak, his most able assistant, he developed special techniques for processing diamond samples into various shapes and sizes (including plates a few microns in thickness). With those specially processed diamond samples in hand, Sellschop traveled the world, setting up collaborative experiments at research centers with much more advanced equipment than any South African laboratory could hope to have. Diamonds and specialized diamond knowledge became his passport to international science: He formed collaborations with groups in Canada, Germany, the UK, the US, and elsewhere, and worked at CERN, the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France, for example.Sellschop’s administrative responsibilities at Wits did not deter his enthusiasm for both his research and his teaching. Well into his tenure as deputy vice-chancellor, he continued lecturing undergraduate students in the physics department; such was his dedication to ensuring continuity in this discipline. But research remained his first love, and he found the time to continue his own research, the supervision of research students, and his international collaborations, despite the tremendous time pressure on him. He worked until late at night and over weekends as well. Research students watching over a particle accelerator, for example, knew they could telephone Sellschop at any hour of the day or night if they encountered a problem or obtained an exciting result. At his home, Sellschop had a sitting and a standing desk, and he would alternate between the two to retain concentration. If sleep was overcoming him in the middle of an important task, he would dive into his swimming pool and then return to work, awake and refreshed.A prolific publisher of scientific publications, Sellschop was a contributor to two books edited by John Field, The Properties of Diamond (Academic Press, 1979) and The Properties of Natural and Synthetic Diamond (Academic Press, 1992). That both chapters are the longest in the books reflects his enthusiasm and dedication. Field says he had an impossible job keeping the Sellschop contributions down to the required length. Until his retirement, Sellschop’s research on diamonds was primarily of a basic nature, but in his last years, he focused on the potential advanced and high-technological applications of diamonds. That work involved either modification of diamond properties using nuclear techniques or using diamonds in nuclear physics-related applications. De Beers and the National Research Foundation of South Africa collaborated and supported this work, which resulted in the filing of several patent applications.Sellschop’s lifelong research has been recognized by many awards, including the Max Planck Society Research Prize, which he received in 1992, and in honorary doctorates conferred by both South African and German universities. Jacques Pierre Friederich Sellschop PPT|High resolution© 2003 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,291
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesTravaux en français237 207