MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1986635926 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0110

Maps of Difference: Canada, Women, and Travel (review)

2007· article· en· W1986635926 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Teresa Heffernan

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTravel Writing and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsTRIPS architectureWhite (mutation)HistoryTravel writingGender studiesQueen (butterfly)SociologyPolitical scienceLawArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Maps of Difference: Canada, Women, and Travel Teresa Heffernan (bio) Wendy Roy. Maps of Difference: Canada, Women, and Travel McGill-Queen’s University Press. xiv, 288. $44.95 Paul Fussell's 1987 anthology of travel writing included fifty-two men but only four women as most women failed to meet his criteria for the genre. The fields of postcolonialism and women's studies, however, have been quick to address this imbalance and a number of influential works have appeared that have considered the differences in the reasons for and modes of women's travel. An important contribution to this growing field is Wendy Roy's Maps of Difference, which explores the intersections of race, gender, and imperialism in the works of three writers. The first, Anna Brownell Jameson, travelled to Canada from England to reconcile with her estranged husband, who had accepted a post in Toronto with the government of Upper Canada. When the marriage failed, she set off on a nine-month trip, as she says, 'to see with my own eyes, the condition of women in savage life.' Her three-volume Winter Studies and Summer Rambles in Canada (1838) considers politics and education in Upper Canada; describes trips to such places as Niagara Falls and Manitoulin Island; documents her encounters with First Nations, particularly Anishinaabe women; and includes sketches of people and landscapes. The second writer, Mina Hubbard, a white middle-class Canadian, travelled through Labrador in 1905 with four male (Métis, Cree, and Inuit) guides. Her husband's own failed voyage to Labrador, which had resulted in his death from starvation two years earlier, prompted Hubbard's trip. In A Woman's Way through Unknown Labrador: An Account of the Exploration of the Nascaupee and George Rivers (1908), she writes of the Innu people she encountered and includes photographs and maps of her travels. In keeping with colonial practice, she assumed the North to be a blank space and named places, many of which remain today, effacing Inuit names. The third writer is Margaret Laurence, who travelled to the British Somaliland [End Page 440] Protectorate in the early 1950s and wrote about the experience in The Prophet's Camel Bell. Accompanying her husband, who was an engineer working for the British colonial government and was in charge of reservoirs, Laurence lived in a Bedford truck in the desert and wrote about her unwanted but inescapable complicity in imperialism, her difficulties in negotiating a feminist position in the context of cultural differences (such as child brides, genital excision, and veiling), and her interest in Somali literature. Roy's attentive and thorough study of these works notes the difficulties for women travellers who must self-consciously perform for an audience that expects of them proper feminine behaviour even in the wilds; who must negotiate their second-class status as women even as their white skin and class position them as superior; and who are necessarily complicit in even as they are resistant to the colonial project, transformed as they are by their travels. The strongest aspect of Roy's book is its consistent attentiveness to these complicated positionings and performances. Her excellent discussions of the use of photography, maps, and sketches refuse any reading of them as authentic. As with all travel narrative, the worlds encountered in these ones are always to some extent textual, whether acknowledged or not. Her comparison of private letters, journals, and accounts of the same events by others that often contradict the official version continually foregrounds the ways in which the final publication is reflexively crafted. Resisting the simplistic readings of travel literature as an 'objective' account, she thus focuses on mapping in both its literal and figurative sense. The theoretical material is not always as thoroughly worked through in her book, and quotes from secondary sources sometimes seem to be dropped in unnecessarily and at random. Moreover, the distinctions between, for instance, the different stakes involved in the representation of First Nations in the 1830s and the early 1900s might have been more carefully historicized, and the distinction between postcolonial and Native studies could have been more sharply delineated. In making grand theoretical claims, Roy sometimes misses nuances as when...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,618
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,876

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,171
Écart entre enseignants0,165 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetTravel Writing and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207