Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Electric Meters: Victorian Physiological Poetics Heather McAlpine Jason R. Rudy. Electric Meters: Victorian Physiological Poetics. Athens: Ohio UP, 2009. 222 pp. US $44.95. An 1881 article in Scientific American looks forward to a day, made possible by the invention of the telegraph, when “science shall have so blended, interwoven, and unified human thoughts and interests that the feeling of universal kinship shall be, not a spasmodic outburst of occasional emotion, but constant and controlling” (quoted in Marvin 199–200). Drawn together in this quotation are some of the key concerns Jason R. Rudy addresses in his compact yet wide-ranging study of electricity’s impact on Victorian poetry and poetics: first, the degree to which the immediacy of electric impulses represented for Victorians a powerful way of re-imagining human connections and, second, anxieties embedded in this discourse about the potential for “spasmodic outburst[s]” of emotion, on the one hand, and the necessity of “controlling” them, on the other. Rudy’s argument centres on the assertion that innovations in the electrical sciences played a pivotal role in the development of Victorian bodily poetics—an idea he articulates under the term “rhythmic epistemology,” defined as the “communication of knowledge and feeling through physiological pulses” (80). Just as the telegraph employs electrical impulses to transmit information immediately across vast distances, he notes, so the rhythmic stresses of poetry convey “the physical impress of a speaking poet” to the reading public (84), imaginatively closing the gap between writer and reader. In this way, the metaphor of electricity and the motif of the electric shock are important means by which Victorian poets explored the interwoven issues of community, communication, and poetics at a time of massive cultural and technological change. Electric Meters contributes to the discussion, gaining momentum since the 1990s, about the effect of electricity and new technologies of communication [End Page 231] on the Victorian vision of human society. Carolyn Marvin’s When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Nineteenth Century (1990) and Laura Otis’s Networking: Communicating with Bodies and Machines in the Nineteenth Century (2001) investigate these developments in Victorian culture more generally; the recent work of Richard Menke (Telegraphic Realism: Victorian Fiction and Other Information Systems, 2007) makes the significant observation that electric communication served as a metaphor for realism in Victorian fiction. Meanwhile, scholars such as G. S. Rousseau, G. J. Barker-Benfield, John Mullan, and Deidre Lynch have uncovered similar points of interchange between the discourses of sociability, sensibility, physiology, and literature in the long eighteenth century—an adjacent area of study Rudy is careful to acknowledge in the first chapter of his book. Thus, while a study of electricity’s influence on the Victorian understanding of human interaction may seem to break little new ground, this book’s focus on poetry and poetics certainly does: where other works in this field address literature at all, they deal almost exclusively with prose fiction. Not only is Rudy’s attention to poetry therefore a welcome and long-overdue broadening of this fascinating line of inquiry, but, as he himself demonstrates, the potential for linking “word, mind, and body” (9) inherent in electrical communication was especially alluring to Victorian poets, who came inevitably to view their work as serving parallel aims. Although Rudy’s stated aim is to study “electric meters” (his term for the interplay of poetic form and electrical epistemologies) in the period between 1830 and 1870—from Tennyson’s poetry of sensation and the invention of the telegraph to the introduction of electric field theory and the “fleshly school” controversy—his first chapter (“The Electric Poetess”) productively traces the roots of these issues into the latter part of the age of sensibility, revealing how the poetry of Mary Robinson (especially in her Della Cruscan incarnation) and Felicia Hemans explores tensions between the communication of passionate feeling and the necessity for reason and restraint. Both poets seek to stimulate sympathy in their readers. However, Robinson and many of her contemporaries, under the influence of Adam Smith and other theorists of sensibility, employ conceptual rather than formal and physiological means in order to appeal to a reader’s reason and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».