Northrop Frye on Milton and Blake. Volume 16 of Collected Works of Northrop Frye (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Northop Frye on Milton and Blake. Volume 16 of Collected Works of Northop Frye John B. Pierce (bio) Northop Frye. Northop Frye on Milton and Blake. Volume 16 of Collected Works of Northop Frye. Edited by Angela Esterhammer University of Toronto Press. xxxvi, 492. $85.00 Volume 16 of the Collected Works of Northrop Frye brings together all of Frye's writings on John Milton and William Blake, with the exception of Fearful Symmetry (reprinted as volume 14 of the Collected Works). The collection itself includes five articles on Milton along with The Return of Eden: Five Essays on Milton's Epics, the latter originally presented as the Centennial Lectures delivered at Huron College in 1963 and published separately in 1965. The Blake portion of the volume includes twenty-three articles ranging from short reviews of books on Blake by Mark Shorer, J.G. Davies, Bernard Blackstone, and David Erdman; to significant essays such as 'Blake's Treatment of the Archetype' and 'Poetry and Design in William Blake,' 'Blake after Two Centuries' and 'The Road of Excess'; to addresses delivered by Frye in the mid- to late-1980s on Blake's biblical illustrations and 'Blake's Bible.' [End Page 574] This volume is crucial reading for anyone interested in Frye for two reasons. First, in drawing together Frye's work on Milton and Blake, the volume affords an excellent opportunity to read Frye on two poets who, as Angela Esterhammer points out in her fine introduction, 'are absolutely central to ... [Frye's] concept of the imaginative structure of Western literature, thought, and society'; she further notes, 'no other poets had a greater lifelong importance to him.' Second, the various writings span forty years, from 1947 to 1987, with the decade between the appearance of Fearful Symmetry in 1947 and that of the Anatomy of Criticism in 1957 standing as a period of particularly prolific production and creative development. Two of the essays on Milton and thirteen of the pieces on Blake appeared in this crucial period, and reading them through in a sitting reminds one of Frye's own comment on Blake in Fearful Symmetry: 'We have pointed out the unusual organic consistency of Blake's symbolism: we cannot trace it back to a time when its main outlines were not clear to him.' Admittedly, this comment, one that makes for a guiding principle in Frye's monumental study of Blake, has been the source of angst for responsible Blake critics and a licence for misreading among his less careful interpreters; however, the 'unusual organic consistency' of Frye's critical work comes into relief in a volume of this type and allows readers of Frye to witness an emerging and intriguing critical order of words. The structures of imagery at the core of the 'Theory of Myths' essay in the Anatomy appears in different forms in 'Blake's Treatment of the Archetype' and 'Notes for a Commentary on Milton' and points forward to the chapter on Metaphor in The Great Code; the convergence of criticism, coherence, and creativity appears throughout the essays, but particularly in The Return of Eden, 'Literature as Context: Milton's Lycidas,' 'The Road of Excess,' and 'The Keys to the Gates'; and the 'framework of ideas' or 'framework of images' setting out four levels of existence appears in a number of guises in a number of the essays. The collection is well edited and Esterhammer's introduction offers an excellent overview of Frye's work on Milton and Blake. Particularly interesting is the concluding commentary on the present relevance of Frye to Blake studies and to criticism in general. Esterhammer notes the reluctance of recent Blake critics to speak 'as thoroughly from Blake's perspective and from within his world as Frye did' and claims that current stress on 'diversity, difference, and regionalism' makes for an uneasy context for criticism with an 'unusual organic consistency.' Yet the inclusion of two different versions of 'Blake's Reading of the Book of Job' illustrates Frye's ability for self-reflection, self-reassessment, and self-correction, and demonstrates that organic consistency still allows for critical difference. John B. Pierce John B. Pierce, Department of English, Queen’s...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,119 | 0,073 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».