MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1986920049 · doi:10.1097/00002030-200009290-00019

Detection of genotypically drug-resistant HIV-1 variants and non-B subtypes in recently infected antiretroviral-naive adults in Italy

2000· article· en· W1986920049 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Romanó, Giulietta Venturi, Rebecca Ferruzzi, Maria Letizia Riccio, Paola Corsi, F Leoncini, Assunta Vinattieri, Laura Incandela, Pier E. Valensin, Maurizio Zazzi

Notice bibliographique

RevueAIDS · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVirologyReverse transcriptaseDrug resistanceTransmission (telecommunications)GenotypeSeroconversionBiologyMedicineGenBankLentivirusViral diseaseProteaseVirusImmunologyPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The treatment of a growing number of infected patients with numerous anti-HIV-1 compounds has raised the concern that drug-resistant viruses are increasingly being transmitted to newly infected individuals [1]. Cohort studies aimed at defining the prevalence of drug-resistant strains in untreated individuals have been reported in the past few months [2–6]. Those studies have indicated frequencies of transmission of drug-resistance ranging from 0 to 20% for reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) and from 0 to 4% for protease inhibitors (PI) in the United States, Canada and Switzerland. In order to define the prevalence of the transmission of HIV-1 drug-resistant variants in Italy we analysed the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and protease sequences from all subjects shown to seroconvert from HIV-1-negative to HIV-1-positive status between June 1996 and May 2000 at three different infectious disease clinics in Tuscany, central Italy (n = 116). Risk factors for HIV-1 infection were male homosexuality for 61 (52.6%), heterosexual contacts for 32 (27.6%), intravenous drug abuse for eight (6.9%), and unknown for 15 (12.9%) subjects. Genotypic resistance testing was performed by infrared sequencing with a LI-COR 4000L instrument [7] at a median of 2 months (range 0–24 months) since the documented seroconversion in the absence of any previous antiretroviral treatment. Reverse transcriptase and protease sequences were deposited at GenBank under accession numbers AF209213–AF209388. Mutations conferring resistance to RTI and PI were detected in the virus populations obtained from 15 (12.9%) and one (0.9%) of the subjects, respectively (Table 1). Twelve individuals (10.3%) were infected with virus containing zidovudine (ZDV) resistance mutations occurring most frequently at reverse transcriptase codons 41 (M41L), 67 (D67N) and 215 (T215Y/F). A mutation at codon 215 compatible with incomplete reversion from resistant to wild type (T215D/S) [8] was the only sign of pre-existing ZDV resistance in HIV-1 sequences from another two patients (nos. 35 and 113). In addition, a T215S substitution was detected in the HIV-1 pol gene from patient 11 in the presence of the M41L ZDV resistance mutation. Five (4.3%) patients harboured HIV-1 sequences with substitutions at codon 184 (three M184I and two M184V) responsible for resistance to lamivudine and, to a lesser extent, didanosine and zalcitabine. HIV-1 sequences from one of these patients (no. 49) also had a substitution at codon 74 (L74I) possibly involved in resistance to didanosine and zalcitabine. A K103N mutation conferring resistance to the whole class of licensed non-nucleoside RTI was found in the virus population from one (0.9%) subject only (no. 13). Likewise, HIV-1 sequences with key mutations responsible for resistance to PI (M46I and L90M) were identified only in subject 83. These mutations were accompanied by secondary substitutions expected to remodel the PI-resistant protease. Similar to other reports [2,4], secondary mutations at polymorphic sites (L10I/F, K20R, L24I, L33F, M36I, D60E, L63P, A71T, V77I) were present in 91 (78.4%) of the HIV-1 sequences independent of the presence of resistance to RTI.Table 1: Drug resistance mutations detected in 15 drug-naive newly infected subjects. The alignment of reverse transcriptase and protease sequences to the consensus sequences of all HIV-1 subtypes (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/retroviruses/subtype/subtype.html) identified eight patients (6.9%) infected with non-B subtypes (one A, one C, one E, two F, and three G). Separate alignments of reverse transcriptase and protease gave consistent results in each case. Of these, only the one infected with subtype C (no. 81) had drug resistance mutations. The prevalence of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants in the newly infected Italian patients analysed was comparable to that recently reported in the USA, Switzerland and Canada [4–6]. Notably, the populations considered in those studies and in our work were quite similar in terms of the number of patients and the time elapsed between seroconversion and analysis. The much lower rate of transmission of HIV-1 variants resistant to RTI reported in another US study [3] may have derived from testing subjects at one year or more after the acquisition of HIV-1 infection, possibly allowing drug-resistant virus to revert to wild type in the absence of drug pressure. However, no evidence of transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 was detected in a recent survey of intravenous drug abusers in Canada [2] analysed at a median of 3 months after seroconversion. Overall, these data suggest that different rates of transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants may be detected when testing populations with different risk factors and durations of infection. Finally, we consider that subtype analysis should be performed while assaying for genotypic drug resistance in patients with both new and established infection in order better to define the circulation of different HIV-1 subtypes and its possible implications [9]. Laura Romanoa Giulietta Venturia Rebecca Ferruzzia Maria Letizia Riccioa Paola Corsib Francesco Leoncinib Assunta Vinattieric Laura Incandelad Pier E. Valensina,e Maurizio Zazzia,e

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,538

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations24
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAIDSMême sujetHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentTravaux en français237 207