Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Surface Interiorities: Representing the Quebec Convent Jennifer Blair McMaster University The practice we have cultivated around here of focusing on interior things is a good safeguard against falling into such beastly ways. Saint Teresa d'Avila The Interior Castle What are interior "things"? For Saint Teresa d'Avila, the sixteenth-century Spanish nun, mystic, and reformer, the things of the interior are not the contents of an inside place but, instead, the matter of the interior's formation, that is, the form, materials, labour, technology, and affects pertaining to its construction. Each successive chapter of The Interior Castle—entitled "First Dwelling," "Second Dwelling," and so forth—is itself an interior that soon becomes the outer threshold for an interior to follow. Structured in this way as a series of dwellings that guide readers ever further into the "castle," Saint Teresa's access of the infinite interior through and especially as limitless movement is comparable to the much more recently conceived phenomenon of "nomadism" associated with Gilles Deleuze. By constantly moving from dwelling to dwelling, The Interior Castle "separates or moves between matter and soul, the façade and the closed room, the outside and the inside." Further, "it is a virtuality that never stops dividing itself" (Deleuze, The Fold 35). For the question of the interior, precisely an architectural one, will always traverse the span between the building material, the exterior walls, the frame, and the space [End Page 69] enclosed inside. In fact, in Saint Teresa's "Fifth Dwelling," movement is a state of the "rapture God gives to the soul" in which Suddenly, the soul will become aware of a movement so swift that it seems as if her spirit were being whisked away. The sheer speed of this movement is terrifying—at least at the beginning.… I have heard of certain people whose bodies were even raised up with their spirits! (195–96) Saint Teresa's openness to an unforeseen, unpredictable movement, one that is decidedly material as much as it is spiritual, is similar to what I want to explore here, but in the context of nineteenth- and twentieth-century representations of the Quebec convent. Whether in the early travel guides to Quebec, the "autobiographical" exposé Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk, Abbot Thomas Maguire's history of the Ursulines entitled Notes sur l'érection primitive du Monastère des Ursulines de Québec, or Clara Gustche's photographs that make up The Convent Series, the convent has posed a significant problem to the authors and artists who have sought to represent this ultimate interior locale on paper. The result, as I will argue here, is that these attempts to come to know and reproduce the convent interior work in such a way as to keep both those who make them, and those who subsequently encounter them, at the surface. To this end, if Saint Teresa's travels to the inside of the castle/soul are subject to the interrupting movement of an outside force, then those who make and engage with the Canadian texts in question are similarly interrupted, in this case from their journeys "in" to the convent. Yet, while these interruptions would seem to prevent the convent scholar from knowing the interior (although perhaps sanctifying it by doing so) they in fact introduce a different representational aesthetic, one that proves satisfactory insofar as it offers a multiplicity of interiors. Saint Teresa seems an appropriate introduction to this essay on convents, but she also serves as an exemplary figure for Deleuze's project of re-orienting the interior as a surface locale. Specifically, Deleuze sees the interior and the exterior as the product of a surface that is in the continual process of "folding." For Deleuze, Bernini's statue of Saint Teresa is a primary example of the way in which folds exhibit the surface's propensity to be moved by outside forces. He asks: "Is it not fire that can alone account for the extraordinary folds of the tunic...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».