MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1987536770 · doi:10.1353/utq.2012.0107

Music Traditions, Cultures, and Contexts (review)

2012· article· en· W1987536770 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
James Kippen

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Musicological Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthnomusicologyMusicologyMusicalHegemonyPopular musicSociologyMusic historyAnthropologyMedia studiesHistoryArt historyArtVisual artsLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Music Traditions, Cultures, and Contexts James Kippen (bio) Robin Elliott and Gordon E. Smith. Music Traditions, Cultures, and Contexts. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. xx, 340. $42.95 Music Traditions, Cultures, and Contexts is a Festschrift honouring the prominent Canadian ethnomusicologist Beverley Diamond on her sixtieth birthday in 2008. Diamond, aptly described as having worked harder than anyone to ‘advance the discipline of ethnomusicology in Canada,’ studied at the University of Toronto and began her teaching career in 1973 at McGill. She went on to teach at Queen’s and York before moving in 2002 to Memorial, Newfoundland, where she is director of the Research Centre for the Study of Music, Media and Place (MMaP) and Canada Research Chair in Traditional Music and Ethnomusicology. As the appendix shows, Bev, as she is cordially referred to throughout, is a prolific scholar whose output is characterized by a geo-cultural focus on the music of North America, particularly First Nations, but whose theoretical contributions range over much broader territory. Her key works are the solo-authored but deeply collaborative Native American Music in Eastern North America (2008), co-edited works Music and Gender (2000, with Pirkko Moisala) and Canadian Music: Issues of Hegemony and Identity (1994, with Robert Witmer), and influential articles including ‘Canadian Reflections on Palindromes, Inversions, and Other Challenges to Ethnomusicology’s Coherence’ in the fiftieth anniversary issue of Ethnomusicology, an important position paper to which only two contributing authors respond. Kay Shelemay examines ethnomusicology’s North Americanist agenda and charts both similarities and differences between Canadian and American perspectives on the intellectual history and politics of the discipline. In many ways, the changes she describes over the course of ethnomusicology’s history are paradigmatic of a broader disciplinary shift from the analysis of culture as product to [End Page 779] culture as process; from a focus on the distant and exotic to a focus on the local, ordinary, everyday; from objective, positivist positions to largely subjective, reflexive, collaborative ones. Diamond’s work is seen as an important component of that evolution, in terms of her research methods as well as reflexive writings on the history of research into Canadian music. Neil Rosenberg also engages Diamond’s question about whether her view from North America’s margins is distinct or different from that of her American colleagues and applies it to his enjoyable history of the Nova Scotia five-stringed banjo. Apart from these two chapters, there are surprisingly few reactions to Diamond’s body of work in this volume. Bruno Nettl offers another overview of ethnomusicology’s evolution as measured in critical self-evaluations and redefinitions, though I disagree that we are currently experiencing such a phase. He shows that we have moved significantly from our prior focus on comparison to one of difference, a theme that dominates Ellen Koskoff’s revealing account of three epiphanies whose lessons teach us to value ethnographic fieldwork because of what we may learn not merely about people living musical lives but about ourselves. Of the remaining contributions, only Charlotte Frisbie’s heavily autobiographical account of her life as a church organist seems to break new ground, and John Beckwith’s is an original contribution to a neglected chapter in Canadian lyric theatre; the remaining chapters appear to go over some quite old ground. The range and diversity of efforts are hard to distil (hence, one ventures, this book’s rather nebulous title). It is a strange Festschrift indeed where the person honoured writes the most interesting and profound contribution. Diamond profiles her husband, her soul mate: British-born Canadian composer Cliff Crawley. It is a lovingly crafted and richly illustrated biography that showcases Diamond’s skill at creating a nuanced, three-dimensional portrait depicting Crawley’s personal history, likes and dislikes, suspicion of intellectualism, and down-to-earth engagement with the everyday experience of life. Her insights and analyses of some of Crawley’s key works demonstrate that she retains ample musicological chops. Bookending this volume, Robin Elliott and Gordon Smith’s overture does an insightful job of intertwining their analysis of Diamond’s professional significance with her autobiographical commentary. Yet, for me, the major disappointment is the coda by Diamond...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,079

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,159 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetDiverse Musicological StudiesTravaux en français237 207