The Heiress vs the Establishment: Mrs. Campbell's Campaign for Legal Justice (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Heiress vs the Establishment: Mrs. Campbell's Campaign for Legal Justice Angela Fernandez (bio) Constance Backhouse and Nancy L. Backhouse . The Heiress vs the Establishment: Mrs. Campbell's Campaign for Legal JusticeOsgoode Society for Canadian Legal History. University of British Columbia Press. xxii, 322. $45.00, $29.95 This book tells the story of Mrs Elizabeth Bethune Campbell, a Toronto-born socialite, untrained in the law, who in the 1920s carried the claim that her mother's estate was defrauded by its trustee, a prominent member of the Ontario legal community, up to the Privy Council, where, as the first woman to ever appear before them, she represented herself and won her case. At the centre of this book, prepared by legal historian Constance Backhouse and her sister, Ontario Superior Court Justice Nancy L. Backhouse, is a reproduction - not a retelling - of Campbell's own account, Where Angels Fear to Tread, published by Campbell herself in 1940. This is a tract, breathless in style, eminently readable and enjoyable, in which Campbell names names, casts aspersions, and formulates conspiracies. Essentially, Campbell argues her case in the way that she never could in the fourteen-year-long litigation. The prefatory materials tell us that the book was something of an 'underground' text, spoken of in hushed voices among members of the [End Page 327] Ontario legal profession and considered a censored text by University of Toronto law students. Many copies were available in Jamaica Plain, Boston, where Campbell lived most of her adult life. One of the notes reports that everyone a local historian spoke with said that 'their mother had a copy' and Campbell's grandson recalled 'many copies of the book lying around his childhood home; apparently a number were used to prop up the couch!' The notes - there are eighty pages of them - are filled with colourful details like this. They also provide background on each person mentioned in the text and serve as a 'reality-check,' signalling, for instance, when a claim that Mrs Campbell made is confirmed by the Privy Council judgment. The authors have clearly given a great deal of thought to the tricky issue of how to present Campbell's story in a way that piques interest and gives context without giving away too much, and, more importantly, without providing a pre-interpreted experience of the text. The primary strength of their presentation is that they allow Campbell to speak and readers to have their own reaction - alternately to laugh at her audacity, gasp at her brashness, and admire her persistence and fortitude. A good example of this 'just the right touch' is the introduction, which says very little about what is to come beyond the facts. However, it includes a marvellous selection of photographs, which include Campbell as a Toronto debutante, a photo of her in her wedding dress, and pictures of her parents, including a long-dead lawyer father. Present here, though conspicuously absent in her own text, is her Boston clergyman husband, along with their spitting-image children. The decision to refrain from providing an up-front analysis of Campbell also allows suspense to build, so that by the time the epilogue arrives, one is dying to hear what the author-editors think of the burning questions at the heart of the story: Was the trustee a crook? Was there really a conspiracy to cover for him? Different perspectives are provided on these questions, along with reflection on Campbell's motives and speculation on why various members of the legal establishment reacted to her in the way that they did. Much of the Backhouses' presentation takes the form of a summary and accompanying photo of each participant in Campbell's legal ordeal, what they did and how that squared or did not square with what Campbell said about them. The author-editors clearly admire Campbell's spunk, as most readers will, but here is where they ask questions about the accuracy of some of her views, comment on some of her less positive personality traits, and compare her account of what happened to what others said. No doubt readers of this text will each emerge with their own...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,025 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».