MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1988181444 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0023

Novel Beginnings: Experiments in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction (review)

2008· article· en· W1988181444 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Helen Oesterheld

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLiteratureFantasyRealismPlot (graphics)Variety (cybernetics)NarrativeHistoryTrope (literature)Art

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Novel Beginnings: Experiments in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction Helen Oesterheld (bio) Patricia Meyer Spacks. Novel Beginnings: Experiments in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006. 320 pp. US$30. ISBN 978-0-300-11031-9. Patricia Meyer Spacks has made a habit of posing fresh questions—and offering fresh responses—to familiar issues. From her foundational work on Frances Burney and eighteenth-century female subjectivity to her trans-historical investigations of boredom and gossip, her interrogation of intellectual problems is precise and thoughtful. Though such has long been Spacks’s modus operandi, Novel Beginnings: Experiments in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction contains not so much a set of questions and responses as an unconventional and dynamic method of reading fiction. Offered as a resource for nonspecialists, Novel Beginnings initiates readers into the delights of eighteenth-century British literature. Accordingly, Spacks’s opening chapter, “The Excitement of Beginnings,” assuredly embraces the variety, exuberance, and strangeness of eighteenth-century novels and makes plain the author’s reluctance to attribute totalizing significance to these qualities. Insisting that her text simply “tell[s] a story” about the richness of eighteenth-century fiction (26), Spacks disavows the desire to definitively plot the development of the novel. Instead, she charts specific novels on an axis of possibilities that shifts between “the imagined poles of realism and fantasy” (23). In this spirit, Spacks forgoes scholarly notes and names in the text only five contemporary literary critics who have substantially impacted the field: Ian Watt, Michael McKeon, J. Paul Hunter, Nancy Armstrong, and Catherine Gallagher (4). Spacks offers no direct engagement with competing readings of texts or of broadly constructed historical arguments; instead, she appends a list of suggested readings organized by chapter. Her goal is not to be exhaustive or even necessarily representative in her analyses, but to “recapture the multiplicity of eighteenth-century fiction” and to “celebrate the act and process of reading” (4), in the hope of bringing to life “the vitality and daring of the early fictional enterprise and to suggest the rewards that eighteenth-century fiction offers its modern and postmodern readers” (26–27). Though ostensibly aimed at a wider reading audience, Novel Beginnings nevertheless interrogates the shape and direction of contemporary eighteenth-century literary studies. In stating that literary history’s “organizational principles” sap the “flavor of individual works” and muddy “their idiosyncracies” (24), Spacks positions her text in opposition to a large body of scholarly and pedagogical work that [End Page 571] relies on systematic interpretations. While not directed at any specific text, author, or methodology, the observation carries a sting. Novel Beginnings’s heuristic structure—seven porous categories of novel types that are designed to “facilitate comparison”—will admittedly “flatten some of actuality’s diversity for the sake of coherence and economy,” but much less so, it is implied, than the “retrospective impositions” of most literary history (26, 4, 23). Even so, the tone and substance of Novel Beginnings are inviting in large part because Spacks deftly generalizes each of the issues that frame her discussion. For example, her discussion of eighteenth-century cultural contexts enumerates over a dozen familiar social factors (among them urbanization, a variety of marketplace pressures, empire-building, population growth and improved health conditions, rising marriage rates, the emerging middle ranks, and a focus on human liberties) that “impinged upon, even helped to determine, the shape of the evolving novel” (5). To these forces, she adds observations about new attitudes towards what mattered in fiction (12–14) and authors’ divergent employments of pacing, plot, detail, and realistic and fantasy modes (18–21). Maintaining a panoramic view of these various conditions—and sidelining the contests of literary history leaves Spacks free to treat each novel as a unique experiment with features that, finally, are irreducible to any one category. She seeks to expose, through the process of reading and comparing novels, the artificiality and insufficiency of using heuristics, even those that organize her own discussion: out of this process, she posits, a new way of reading texts might emerge. To that end, Spacks enumerates eight subgenres of the novel, devoting a chapter to each. The categories/chapter titles are “The Novel of Adventure...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,598
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetLiterature: history, themes, analysisTravaux en français237 207