MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1988348383 · doi:10.1603/008.102.0420

Insect Sounds and Communication: Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution

2009· article· en· W1988348383 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueOrthoptera Research and Taxonomy
Établissements canadiensThe Scarborough Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyEcologyEvolutionary physiologyEvolutionary ecologyInsectChemical ecologyEvolutionary biologyZoology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Insect Sounds and Communication: Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and EvolutionSakis Drosopoulos and Michael F Claridge CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005 532 pp., $145 (hardcover)ISBN 0-8493-2060-7 In Insect Sounds and Communication, Sakis Drosopoulos and Michael F. Claridge have put together a volume that summarizes the current state of the discipline in insect bioacoustics. This is a large and active field that has produced several monographs and edited volumes. Some have been more general, such as Arthropod Bioacoustics (Ewing 1989), whereas others, like The Tettigoniidae (Bailey and Rentz 1990) or Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology (Huber et al. 1989) have concentrated on particular taxa. What sets this book apart from its predecessors is the balanced taxonomic coverage. In the past, insect bioacoustics has been dominated by crickets, katydids, grasshoppers, and cicadas. These are some of the most obviously acoustic groups, with many species communicating via airborne sound and at frequencies audible to the human ear, and they have rightfully received much attention from biologists. Over the past couple of decades, there has been increasing interest in acoustic communication in a wider diversity of taxonomic groups, and Insect Sounds and Communication reflects this trend. This broadening of interests has been driven by a proliferation of off-the-shelf digital signal analysis software and the development of widely available and accessible tools for recording substrate-borne acoustic signals. It is now well known that substrateborne acoustic signals are even more widespread among insects than airborne sounds, and substrate-borne vibration signals are well represented in this book. Acoustic communication has now been documented in a wide range of insect taxa and this diversity is similarly well represented in the book, which includes chapters on Heteroptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Psylloidea, Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera, among others. Cicadas and acoustic Orthoptera are not left out, but they do not receive a disproportionate coverage relative to other taxa. The 32 contributed chapters in the book are organized in two sections. The first section, “General aspects of insect sounds,” comprises brief reviews of theoretical and conceptual issues, such as the relationship between song evolution and speciation, the evolution of signal complexity, physical constraints on acoustic signals, heritability of song characteristics, and the taxonomic significance of acoustic characters. This section also includes several more conventional literature reviews of systems that have been more extensively studied, including hearing in katydids, vibration senses in bugs, and communication in lacewings. There is also an introductory primer (Chapter 2) on acoustics and techniques of recording and analysis of acoustic signals. Although some aspects of this techniques chapter will eventually become dated (e.g., it includes brief reviews of specific software packages), it is nevertheless a useful orientation for the newcomer to acoustic analyses, covering the basics of physical acoustics and digital signal processing in the context of recording natural sounds. The second section, “Sounds in various taxa,” surveys the signal repertoires and acoustic behaviors of select insect groups. This is a very useful compendium. More familiar acoustic groups, such as cicadas, are represented here, but there are also chapters on whiteflies, lantern flies, and nondrosophilid Diptera, among others. The contributions in this section are a handy reference on the structure, diversity, and production mechanisms of acoustic signals in these taxa. A DVD is included with the book that contains a number of useful features. The DVD is formatted as a self-contained website that includes figures, color images, media files, and supplemental information for many of the chapters. The full bibliography is also included and there are external links to the software packages reviewed in the Chapter 2 and several research websites on taxa covered in the book. This is a useful appendix to the book, particularly the sound and movie clips. Unfortunately, not all chapters are represented on the DVD, the formatting and content are not consistent among those that are included, and there is little or no indication in the text that additional information is available on the disc. But these are minor issues given how difficult it must have been to convince the numerous authors of this volume to deliver supplemental content in addition to their written contributions by publication time. As with any edited volume, there is some variation in the scope and depth of different contributions. This does not detract from the value of the book. It can be quite useful to have a brief review of a single question (such as body size-to-frequency relationships in acoustic signals, or acoustic segregation in grasshopper communities), and a volume such as this is the ideal forum. Likewise, those contributions covering a particular system in more detail provide a valuable digest of the diversity of insect acoustic communication. Drosopoulos and Claridge have put together a volume that will benefit anyone with an interest in insect bioacoustics and that I, for one, expect to return to frequently.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaMême sujetOrthoptera Research and TaxonomyTravaux en français237 207