MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1988746002 · doi:10.2523/iptc-12865-ms

Real-time Downhole Monitoring and Logging Reduced Mud Loss Drastically for High-Pressure Gas Wells in Tarim Basin, China

2008· article· en· W1988746002 sur OpenAlexaff
Shunchang Wang, Xinquan Zheng, Chun Jiang Zheng, Bailin Wu, Yiming Jiang, Tang Jiping, YU Jin-hai, Honghai Fan

Notice bibliographique

RevueAll Days · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensPetro-Canada
Organismes subventionnairesPetroChina Company Limited
Mots-clésGeologyMud loggingDrillingPetroleum engineeringCasingTarim basinWindow (computing)Well loggingNatural gas fieldDrilling fluidWell controlMeasurement while drillingSichuan basinMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringPetrologyNatural gasEngineeringGeochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes a real-time case study to prevent mud loss and blowouts while drilling a high-pressure gas well in Tarim basin, China. The complex geological structure, high tectonic stresses, and overpressured and fractured reservoir formations in the field present a huge challenge to drilling. Of the seven wells drilled in the field in 2005, two did not reach target depths, four experienced huge mud loss, and the other experienced a blowout resulting in lost control of the well. In early 2006, PetroChina teamed up with Schlumberger and Petroleum University of China to form a collaborative technical group to develop a better understanding of mud loss and blowout mechanisms. The key component of the study was to establish a geomechanical earth model based on offset well data prior to drilling, update the model using downhole monitoring and logging data during drilling, and predict a safe mud weight window in real-time. Real-time prediction of a safe mud weight window with annular pressure monitoring helped ensure that downhole annular pressure was maintained within the safe mud weight window during drilling and tripping. The study resulted in a 20-times reduction in mud loss and 10-times reduction in nonproductive time, and elimination of an extra casing. A better understanding of mud loss/blowout mechanisms was achieved and guidelines for preventing mud loss/blowouts specific for this gas field were developed. Introduction The target well is located in a highly fractured complex geological structure with abnormally high pore pressure in reservoir section. Of the seven wells drilled in 2005, two did not reach the target depth due to over pressure. Huge mud loss (averaged approximately 1500 m3 per well) was experienced in the other four wells. The mud loss was responsible for 42% of total drilling incidents, significant non productive time (33.38% of total NPT) and over budget (see Figure 1). An underground blowout occurred in a recent well resulted in lost control of the well. It has been observed that a mud weight slightly too high could hydraulically fracture the borehole and result in significant mud losses, and a mud weight slightly too low could lead to blowout with potentially disastrous consequences. It is therefore critical to be able to predict, in realtime, the extremely narrow safe mud weight window so that necessary measurements can be taken to mitigate the risks. In early 2006, PetroChina teamed up with Schlumberger and China Petroleum University to form a collaborative technical group to develop a better understanding of mud loss and blowout mechanisms. Based on the technical group's suggestion, a real-time pore pressure monitoring was conducted for an appraisal well to be drilled in 2006 in the field. The study primarily consisted of three stages - pre-drill planning, execution during drilling and evaluation post drilling. The key task of this process was to build and update a Mechanics Earth Model (MEM), which formed the basis for safe mud weight window prediction.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,058
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,202
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAll DaysMême sujetDrilling and Well EngineeringTravaux en français237 207