MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1989163023 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31818a9c5e

Harry J. Buncke, M.D., 1922 to 2008

2008· article· en· W1989163023 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rudolf F. Buntic

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNoticeMedicineConvictionPsychoanalysisArt historyPsychologyLawHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I did not know Harry Buncke when he began to investigate and then immerse himself in what later became microsurgery, when he achieved so many of his “firsts” for which he will long be remembered. However, I came to know later that anything Harry Buncke pursued he did so with confidence in the outcome. He worked to mend and to heal patients with wounds thought to be unmendable, and he sought to treat those that had no treatments. When the situation was difficult and faltering in the operating room, Harry Buncke had ability and dexterity under pressure. His technical gifts allowed him to achieve the goal he always set for himself: results. Results defined him and pushed him. Results were his conviction and were what made him successful. Harry Buncke’s philosophy, as many had heard him say, was “Ideas are cheap, results are priceless.” When you took notice of him speaking those words, you felt a call to roll up your sleeves, scrub, and get to work. He gave you an invitation to strive, to work with the instruments of your mind, your hands, and with your colleagues to accomplish. He invited you, the residents, fellows, nurses, and staff with him on his journey, and he accomplished great things. Harry Buncke had results, many results, and they were priceless. His own life was a fulfillment of that philosophy. As a resident, and then a fellow and attending surgeon, I worked closely with Dr. Buncke. I have had time to reflect on what made him great. You could see it when you saw him walking down the hallway to the operating room at Davies. He had a demeanor and presence that won you over. It was a presence that was cheerful and invigorating. He greeted everyone by name. A large intellect, incredible warmth, and great, great hands set him apart. When presented with a difficult patient, he did not get overwhelmed, but set in motion. He knew what to do, no matter what the effort or challenge, and he got results. Harry Buncke helped to reshape our specialty. He worked to give us greater choices for patients and urged us to save limbs and human tissues after accidents, cancer, or the fate of a birth malformation. When small blood vessel surgery was just an idea, before the term “microsurgery” had even been coined, he made the instruments and the suture with bonded needles to make replantation possible. When a man came to him with no thumb, he pioneered toe transplantation to mend that man. When a patient came to him with four fingers amputated, he did not hesitate because four fingers had never been reattached before. He successfully microsurgically replanted those fingers. When surgeons needed to be trained in his new techniques, he tutored them, and he published over 400 scientific articles to share that knowledge. Harry Buncke got results, and he was honored for those results. He was elected President of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, and was awarded the recipient of the Jacobson Innovation Award of the American College of Surgeons. In this Journal, he was called one of the top 10 plastic surgeons of the twentieth century.1 The American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons gave him the Presidential Award in 1997, and the International Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery gave him the Millennium Award in 1999. His medical triumphs were supported by his family and personal contentment. Serendipity blessed him when he met and later married Constance Millette. With her, he went to medical school, and he shared in the pride of their children—Greg, Geoff, Adele, and Paul. When surgeons from around the world visited Dr. Buncke, they saw not only the father of microsurgery, but the father that enjoyed and spent time with his family: how he worked on his ranch, how he taught his children the skills to grow, and how he and Dr. Constance Buncke guided them to their own achievements. The children grew to be three doctors and a builder. Harry Buncke got results. With the force of his optimism and the deftness of his hands, he built the craft of microsurgery and its limitless applications. Today, all across the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, and South America, hundreds of surgeons who learned from Harry Buncke have lost their mentor, but all those he mentored still have something to guide them. They, and we, have his example. We do stand on the shoulders of a giant.Figure: Harry J. Buncke, M.D., 1922 to 2008.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,088
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207