Behavioral Mapping of Residents’ Activity in Five Residential Style Care Centers for Elderly Persons Diagnosed with Dementia: Small Differences in Sites Can Affect Behaviors
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The principal purpose of the study was to investigate the day-long patterns of activity of residents and staff in five similar care centers for people with Alzheimer's disease. The Therapeutic Environment Assessment Scale provided an architectural basis for assessing the significance of activity data gathered through behavior mapping. Slight architectural differences contributed to effects that were large and enduring, producing as much as a 50% differences between sites in the portion of residents involved. Taken together, the results suggest that resident status, use patterns, and architectural design details of a homelike residential setting have significant effects on the daily activities of residents. KEYWORDS: dementiaphysical environmentlong-term careresidential careassisted livingTESS-2+direct observationbehavior mapping Supported in part by an Alzheimer Care Research Grant, awarded by a joint committee of the University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, and CapitalCare, Edmonton, AB to D. Milke as principal investigator. The researchers thank the staff of the five centers for their efforts and the residents and families for their participation. Notes bDoes not include research/teaching wing. Total for entire floor space is 40,382 sq. ft. cRoom at WDS was not intended as a lounge, i.e., a retreat from work; to professionalize the care staff role it was to serve as a place to read and discuss work. At other sites the lunch room also served as a lounge. dRoom was intended as a multi-purpose room. bItems used to compute the 18-item Special Care Environmental Quality Scale; item 27b and 27c were treated as a single item and item 15 was misnumbered in the TESS-2+ Revised version (as item 13). cItem 20 is the percentage of common rooms with signs/graphics; floor plans in all sites allowed a view into common rooms (scored as zero). dAn item was unintentionally omitted from the TESS-2+ scoring form (10 in Odors and 11 in Safety). eComposite Above Average Quality Score represents the percentage of TESS-2+ domains that were above average in quality. ∗Resident data were adjusted to show the mean percent of residents at a site who were observed per scan per day. aASB—Asbury Place; MDR—Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Place; MPN—McConnell Place North; MPW—McConnell Place West; WDS—Woodside Place. bTotal areas is the sum of the following: total common, total outdoor and total house. cTotal house areas is the sum of Houses #1, House #2, and House #3. Blank cells indicate that the question was not applicable. dHouse kitchen and living/dining rooms are summed across houses. ∗Resident data were adjusted to show the mean percent of residents at a site who were observed per scan per day. Dashes indicate that residents were not observed in these areas.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle