MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1990173169 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.11.217

Pharmacokinetics of anti tumor necrosis factor antibody (infliximab) in children with acute GVHD involving the gastrointestinal tract

2006· article· en· W1990173169 sur OpenAlexaff
B. Sleight, S. Shenoy, Ann E. Haight, Ravi Vora, Uma Prabhakar, Kirk R. Schultz, Alan S. Gamis, John E. Levine, Thomas Braun, Gregory A. Yanik

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Établissements canadiensBC Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInfliximabGastroenterologyPharmacokineticsCmaxInternal medicineTrough levelDosingClinical endpointPharmacodynamicsSurgeryTumor necrosis factor alphaClinical trialTransplantation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Infliximab (REMICADE®, Centocor), a chimeric anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody, has been used in the management of patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD. Though preliminary results using infliximab have been encouraging, the pharmacokinetics (Pk) of infliximab in this clinical setting have yet to be defined. A prospective trial examining the Pk of infliximab in pediatric patients with gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD was undertaken. Five subjects (median 11 yrs, range 9 mo–17 yrs) with GI GVHD were enrolled. All subjects had histologic confirmation of GVHD and had failed > 48 hours of corticosteroids prior to study entry. Subjects received a single 5 mg/kg dose of infliximab. PK and pharmacodynamic samples were drawn at 16 time points (hours 0, 1, 2, 6, 24, 48, 96, weekly days 7–42, days 56, 70, 84). Based upon existing Pk data in patients with Crohn’s disease, the time required to reach a trough concentration ≤2 mcg/ml was the defined primary study endpoint. Results: Dosing was well tolerated in all five subjects. Infliximab concentrations are as follows: Peak concentrations (Cmax) ranged from 64-160 mcg/ml and were achieved by hours 2–6. Drug concentrations > 20 mcg/ml were maintained for > 7 days in all subjects. The primary endpoint (trough concentration □ 2 mcg/ml) was reached on days 28, 35, 21, 35, and 7(asterisk) (median 28 days, mean 25 days), respectively. Infectious complications with a possible attribution to infliximab included endocarditis on day 21 in 1 subject and CMV reactivation 1 month post infliximab in a second subject. No invasive fungal infections were seen. Durable complete responses of GVHD were seen in 2 subjects by days 7 and 28, respectively. Two subjects are alive (6 months and 16 months). Conclusion: In summary, pharmacokinetics of infliximab indicate that concentrations > the targeted threshold level can be maintained for several weeks following a single 5 mg/kg dose in patients with GI GVHD. A phase II clinical trial, with dosing intervals based upon these Pk parameters, will be required. This investigator-initiated study was conducted through the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium. Infliximab and partial financial support were provided by Centocor, Inc. Infliximab (REMICADE®, Centocor), a chimeric anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody, has been used in the management of patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD. Though preliminary results using infliximab have been encouraging, the pharmacokinetics (Pk) of infliximab in this clinical setting have yet to be defined. A prospective trial examining the Pk of infliximab in pediatric patients with gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD was undertaken. Five subjects (median 11 yrs, range 9 mo–17 yrs) with GI GVHD were enrolled. All subjects had histologic confirmation of GVHD and had failed > 48 hours of corticosteroids prior to study entry. Subjects received a single 5 mg/kg dose of infliximab. PK and pharmacodynamic samples were drawn at 16 time points (hours 0, 1, 2, 6, 24, 48, 96, weekly days 7–42, days 56, 70, 84). Based upon existing Pk data in patients with Crohn’s disease, the time required to reach a trough concentration ≤2 mcg/ml was the defined primary study endpoint. Results: Dosing was well tolerated in all five subjects. Infliximab concentrations are as follows: Peak concentrations (Cmax) ranged from 64-160 mcg/ml and were achieved by hours 2–6. Drug concentrations > 20 mcg/ml were maintained for > 7 days in all subjects. The primary endpoint (trough concentration □ 2 mcg/ml) was reached on days 28, 35, 21, 35, and 7(asterisk) (median 28 days, mean 25 days), respectively. Infectious complications with a possible attribution to infliximab included endocarditis on day 21 in 1 subject and CMV reactivation 1 month post infliximab in a second subject. No invasive fungal infections were seen. Durable complete responses of GVHD were seen in 2 subjects by days 7 and 28, respectively. Two subjects are alive (6 months and 16 months). Conclusion: In summary, pharmacokinetics of infliximab indicate that concentrations > the targeted threshold level can be maintained for several weeks following a single 5 mg/kg dose in patients with GI GVHD. A phase II clinical trial, with dosing intervals based upon these Pk parameters, will be required. This investigator-initiated study was conducted through the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium. Infliximab and partial financial support were provided by Centocor, Inc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,369
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,445

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationMême sujetImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersTravaux en français237 207