MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1990756155 · doi:10.1353/can.2011.0070

North of the Color Line: Migration and Black Resistance in Canada, 1870–1955 (review)

2011· article· en· W1990756155 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jared G. Toney

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResistance (ecology)ImmigrationPsychological nativismColor lineLegislationMiddle PassageHistoryEconomic historyPolitical scienceRacismGender studiesEthnologySociologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: North of the Color Line: Migration and Black Resistance in Canada, 1870–1955 Jared Toney North of the Color Line: Migration and Black Resistance in Canada, 1870–1955. Sarah-Jane Mathieu. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010. Pp. 296, $65.00 (cloth), $22.95 (paper) From the advent of the transatlantic slave trade, mobility, migration, and resistance have been central features of the black experience in the Western Hemisphere. In North of the Color Line, Sarah-Jane Mathieu examines nineteenth- and twentieth-century migrations to Canada from the United States and the Caribbean, and the resultant (trans-)national mobilizations against racial segregation, discrimination, and nativism. At the centre of her analysis are the black railway workers who linked communities of resistance across Canada and combated deprecating racialisms in all aspects of Canadian life: from places of work and places of leisure, to federal legislation on immigration, to human rights issues. Mathieu contrasts mid-nineteenth-century perceptions of Canada as a haven for African-American slave fugitives with the gradual development, entrenchment, and institutionalization of a Canadian colour line that denied equality to peoples of African descent in Canada. Concluding in the mid-1950s, her study considers the legacy of black activism created by railway porters and examines how their early struggles in the workplace translated into large-scale mobilizations against Jim Crow throughout Canadian society. In so doing, she tells a story of advances and withdrawals, of victories and defeats, of unity and disjuncture, as African Americans, African Canadians, and African West Indians resisted racial subjugation and demanded equal rights and opportunities in Canada and throughout North America. Mathieu’s study makes more than a few meaningful contributions to both Canadian and us historiographies and significantly advances the literature on black migration, identity, and resistance in North America. Engaging with studies by Eric Arnesen and Agnes Calliste, among others, Mathieu demonstrates the centrality of the railways for black men and communities north of the forty-second parallel. As [End Page 722] they traversed the continent, black porters linked communities across physical space, and in so doing facilitated a transcontinental, and indeed transnational, exchange. Porters, she asserts, ‘were the guardians of their communities’ and ‘became crucial social and political conduits because of their access and connections to that national black Canadian network’ (163, 150). They also confronted Jim Crow in its various forms and incarnations, navigating a dynamic, complex, and often hostile racial terrain. As this book convincingly argues, porters were thus at the vanguard of the struggle against racial inequality wherever they encountered it, as they mobilized first against the discriminatory practices of their employers, unions, and fellow railwaymen and later campaigned against xenophobic government policies and institutional practices. Mathieu demonstrates that through the politicization of these railway workers, struggles against class and racial oppression were inextricably conflated, and black porters combated them simultaneously as part of the same campaign against racism in Canada. While Mathieu creatively places the histories of Canada and the United States in dialogue with one another, sketching the transnational networks of black resistance through North America, she also endeavours to articulate a distinctly Canadian experience, moving the nation out from the shadows of us history and historiography. In so doing, she brings a critical eye to the complicity of Canadians in the formulation of colour lines and the discriminatory views and practices of Canadian politicians and employers as well as the general public. White Canadians, Mathieu argues, ‘hid behind an outward civility,’ even in their vociferous (and, as she notes, disproportionate) hysteria and opposition to the arrival of black immigrants (16). Claims of the ‘climatic unsuitability’ of peoples of African descent, as well as the assertion that blackness posed a distinctly and exclusively foreign threat, legitimized discriminatory practices at the border and helped to perpetuate a rhetorically white Canadian national identity. Black people in Canada, however, effectively invoked the country’s abolitionist tradition, as well as ideas of British fair play, to contest the racism they encountered and to legitimize their place within the nation. One of the most provocative assertions Mathieu makes is in regard to the central role of railway porters in the formation and articulation of a black...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,296
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,596

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical Review→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→