A Private-Public Strategy for International Marketing Through Collective Brands: Canada Brand Foods
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract A country brand for agrifood products requires managing quality across a range of products and firms while recognizing the potential pitfalls in linking a brand's image with a country's image. Understanding the incentives for firms adopting the brand to use and contribute to the brand's equity informs the choice of brand management mechanism. The challenges in managing a country brand for international agrifood exports are discussed. This case is used to illustrate a strategy based on the obstacles faced by a collective brand that is used by many firms. The article highlights how a successful strategy will produce a brand that is unique, robust to impersonators, and has quality assurance mechanisms that are in line with firm's incentives to produce high-quality products. KEYWORDS: brand strategycountry branddifferentiationmarketingpublic-private partnership Notes In this article we make a clear distinction between brands and labels. A label simply identifies a specific product characteristic pertaining only and precisely to the product itself (such as origin or composition), whereas a brand is a broader concept that captures a product's characteristics, its reputation, and the accumulated customer experience with that brand name and symbol that is viewed at the customer's point of purchase. “Canada's Approach on Kyoto Criticized” (Whittington, Citation2007), “Credibility Hangs on Meeting Kyoto Targets” (Anonymous, Citation2007), “The U.S. Is Set to Move on Climate Change—What About Us?” (Simpson, Citation2006). It is also possible that the development and marketing costs associated with a country brand might be shared with both the firms using the brand and the government bearing the cost. Although this would alter the threshold of a firm's decision to use a brand, it would not materially alter the results. The moratoriums in both Quebec and Manitoba have arisen in response to concerns about the effect of pork industry expansion on water quality. Runoff and leaching of manure leading to groundwater contamination were key concerns that precipitated the bans. The effects of Brazil creating its own brand described earlier rely on the assumption that the characteristics contributing to the success of the Canada brand are unique to Canada and cannot be simply adopted as characteristics of the Brazilian brand. There is also the potential for a more complex strategic game to be played between the owner of the brand, Canada, and the imitator, Brazil. Indeed, New Zealand has already carved out this niche in markets such as lamb (Clemens & Babcock, Citation2004) as has Denmark in the case of pork (Hobbs et al., Citation1998). The Compté Cheese label has developed stringent process and quality standards relating to the breed of cow milked, the feed they are fed, origin of milk used for cheese, and the method for making the cheese itself. The protected nature of the Compté label enables the standards to be enforced strictly and has resulted in a consistent quality product, recognized as such by consumers (European Commission, Citation2006). The Boerenkaas label is not protected and consists of a variety of small and large producers. Attempts to establish consistent standards have been largely unsuccessful due to the heterogeneous nature of producers and the inability to control who uses the label. Consumer recognition of Boerenkaas is limited to 13%; production has been declining in recent years and the label has lost most of its distinctness (European Commission, Citation2006). Credence attributes are those whose quality cannot be identified even after consumption (Darby & Karni, Citation1973). Search attributes are those that can be ascertained upon inspection, and experience attributes are only ascertained following consumption (Nelson, Citation1970). A terroir by definition refers to the climate and soil characteristics of a particular region. Additional informationNotes on contributorsBrian G. Innes Brian G. Innes is a Research Associate in the Department of Bioresource Policy, Business and Economics at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada. William A. Kerr William A. Kerr is Van Vliet Professor of International Trade at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Jill E. Hobbs Jill E. Hobbs is Professor and Head, Department of Bioresource Policy, Business and Economics at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».